Performance comparison of aptamer- and antibody-based biosensors for bacteria detection on glass surfaces

buir.contributor.authorÇetin, Barbaros
buir.contributor.orcidBarbaros, Çetin|0000-0001-9824-4000
dc.citation.epage124
dc.citation.issueNumber1
dc.citation.spage110
dc.citation.volumeNumber58
dc.contributor.authorBalcı, O.
dc.contributor.authorKürekçi, A.
dc.contributor.authorÖzalp, V. C.
dc.contributor.authorBarbaros, Çetin
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T11:56:34Z
dc.date.available2025-02-19T11:56:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-26
dc.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.departmentInstitute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology (UNAM)
dc.description.abstractAntibodies are the most common ligands in commercial and research assay systems for detecting whole pathogen cells. On the other hand, aptamers are superior ligands with many advantages over antibodies in sensitive and robust assay development. Extensive comparisons between aptamer-based biosensors and immune sensors are limited to protein analytes. Here, we report a comparison of ligands (four antibodies and one aptamer for each bacteria) to be used as a biosensor for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus on glass surfaces through systematic experiments. We have demon-strated that anti-E. coli antibody and mouse monoclonal to S. aureus have the best performance among the compared ligands. Hence, the ligands with the best performance were further investigated within the scope of linear range, analytical sensitivity, and reproducibility of the results. We have demonstrated that anti-E. coli antibody with a capture efficiency of 89.1% and mouse monoclonal to S. aureus with a capture efficiency of 88.2% have the best performance among the compared ligands. The results suggest that antibody ligands function with higher efficiency than aptamer ligands but aptamers have strong potential as an analytical tool.
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Civanmert Şevluğ (civanmert.sevlug@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2025-02-19T11:56:34Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Performance_comparison_of_aptamer-_and_antibody-based_biosensors_for_bacteria_detection_on_glass_surfaces.pdf: 1730836 bytes, checksum: 68a393a767bf9967cdecbe5d91c3cc53 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T11:56:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Performance_comparison_of_aptamer-_and_antibody-based_biosensors_for_bacteria_detection_on_glass_surfaces.pdf: 1730836 bytes, checksum: 68a393a767bf9967cdecbe5d91c3cc53 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024-02-26en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00032719.2024.2318448
dc.identifier.eissn1532-236X
dc.identifier.issn0003-2719
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/116435
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc.
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2024.2318448
dc.source.titleAnalytical Letters
dc.subjectAntibody
dc.subjectAptamer
dc.subjectBacteria detection
dc.subjectBiosensor
dc.subjectGlass surface
dc.titlePerformance comparison of aptamer- and antibody-based biosensors for bacteria detection on glass surfaces
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Performance_comparison_of_aptamer-_and_antibody-based_biosensors_for_bacteria_detection_on_glass_surfaces.pdf
Size:
1.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: