Allocation rules on networks

dc.citation.epage892en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber4en_US
dc.citation.spage877en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber43en_US
dc.contributor.authorİlkılıç, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKayı Ç.ğ.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T10:59:34Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T10:59:34Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Economicsen_US
dc.description.abstractWhen allocating a resource, geographical and infrastructural constraints have to be taken into account. We study the problem of distributing a resource through a network from sources endowed with the resource to citizens with claims. A link between a source and a citizen depicts the possibility of a transfer from the source to the citizen. Given the endowments at each source, the claims of citizens, and the network, the question is how to allocate the available resources among the citizens. We consider a simple allocation problem that is free of network constraints, where the total amount can be freely distributed. The simple allocation problem is a claims problem where the total amount of claims is greater than what is available. We focus on resource monotonic and anonymous bilateral principles satisfying a regularity condition and extend these principles to allocation rules on networks. We require the extension to preserve the essence of the bilateral principle for each pair of citizens in the network. We call this condition pairwise robustness with respect to the bilateral principle. We provide an algorithm and show that each bilateral principle has a unique extension which is pairwise robust (Theorem 1). Next, we consider a Rawlsian criteria of distributive justice and show that there is a unique “Rawls fair” rule that equals the extension given by the algorithm (Theorem 2). Pairwise robustness and Rawlsian fairness are two sides of the same coin, the former being a pairwise and the latter a global requirement on the allocation given by a rule. We also show as a corollary that any parametric principle can be extended to an allocation rule (Corollary 1). Finally, we give applications of the algorithm for the egalitarian, the proportional, and the contested garment bilateral principles (Example 1). © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en_US
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T10:59:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00355-014-0815-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1761714
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/26422
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-014-0815-xen_US
dc.source.titleSocial Choice and Welfareen_US
dc.titleAllocation rules on networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Allocation rules on networks.pdf
Size:
369.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version