Modeling of dielectrophoretic particle motion: Point particle versus finite‐sized particle

Simple item page
dc.citation.epage1418en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber11en_US
dc.citation.spage1407en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber38en_US
dc.contributor.authorÇetin B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorÖner, D. S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaranoğlu, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-12T07:04:04Z
dc.date.available2019-02-12T07:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-06en_US
dc.description.abstractDielectrophoresis (DEP) is a very popular technique for microfluidic bio‐particle manipulation. For the design of a DEP‐based microfluidic device, simulation of the particle trajectory within the microchannel network is crucial. There are basically two approaches: (i) point‐particle approach and (ii) finite‐sized particle approach. In this study, many aspects of both approaches are discussed for the simulation of direct current DEP, alternating current DEP, and traveling‐wave DEP applications. Point‐particle approach is implemented using Lagrangian tracking method, and finite‐sized particle is implemented using boundary element method. The comparison of the point‐particle approach and finite‐sized particle approach is presented for different DEP applications. Moreover, the effect of particle–particle interaction is explored by simulating the motion of closely packed multiple particles for the same applications, and anomalous‐DEP, which is a result of particle–wall interaction at the close vicinity of electrode surface, is illustrated.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Burcu Böke (tburcu@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2019-02-12T07:04:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Modeling_of_dielectrophoretic_particle_motion_Point_particle_versus_finite_sized_particle.pdf: 1098573 bytes, checksum: 86c530e6d3f480d52e5d2f9bf8124638 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2019-02-12T07:04:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Modeling_of_dielectrophoretic_particle_motion_Point_particle_versus_finite_sized_particle.pdf: 1098573 bytes, checksum: 86c530e6d3f480d52e5d2f9bf8124638 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-06en
dc.embargo.release2018-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/elps.201600461en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1522-2683
dc.identifier.issn0173-0835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/49289
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherWiley - V C H Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaAen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201600461en_US
dc.source.titleElectrophoresisen_US
dc.subjectBoundary element methoden_US
dc.subjectDielectrophoresisen_US
dc.subjectLagrangian tracking methoden_US
dc.subjectMicrofluidicsen_US
dc.titleModeling of dielectrophoretic particle motion: Point particle versus finite‐sized particleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Modeling_of_dielectrophoretic_particle_motion_Point_particle_versus_finite_sized_particle.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Scholarly Publications - Mechanical Engineering