A shortfall of rights and justice: Judicial review of immigration detention in Greece

Date
2022
Advisor
Supervisor
Co-Advisor
Co-Supervisor
Instructor
Source Title
European journal of legal studies
Print ISSN
Electronic ISSN
1973-2937
Publisher
European University Institute
Volume
14
Issue
SI
Pages
97 - 131
Language
English
Type
Article
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Series
Abstract

This article critically examines the judicial review of immigration detention in Greece. Specifically, it analyzes the inconsistencies in domestic court rulings, particularly in differentiating between asylum and pre-removal detention, as well as between restrictions on and deprivation of liberty. On the basis of an extended review of decisions by Greece's first instance courts and the Council of State, this article argues that the above-described deficiencies in domestic judicial control must be attributed to the system's institutional design. Greece's lower administrative courts are tasked with reviewing the lawfulness of detention orders and their rulings are not subject to appeal. Although this system ensures speediness, it has also allowed the development of an inconsistent and often unpredictable jurisprudence, to the detriment of the effectiveness required by European norms. The article calls for an institutional reform that would allow for higher administrative courts, such as the Council of State, to act as appellate courts and review the constitutionality of detention orders. This would strengthen the ability of national judges to resolve long-standing normative questions about the law. It would ultimately lead to a kind of judicial control that is more coherent and more conducive to human rights protection.

Course
Other identifiers
Book Title
Keywords
Immigration detention, Judicial review, Irregular migration, Asylum, EU Directives
Citation
Published Version (Please cite this version)