Religion and Coalition Politics

Date
2013
Authors
Birnir, J. K.
Satana, N. S.
Advisor
Supervisor
Co-Advisor
Co-Supervisor
Instructor
Source Title
Comparative Political Studies
Print ISSN
0010-4140
Electronic ISSN
Publisher
Sage Publications, Inc.
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
3 - 30
Language
English
Type
Article
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Series
Abstract

The literature holds that coalition-building parties prefer the policy distance of coalition partners to be as small as possible. In light of continued importance of religion in electoral politics cross-nationally, the distance argument is worrisome for minorities seeking political access because many minorities are of different religion than the majority representatives forming coalitions. The authors suggest plurality parties' objectives to demonstrate inclusiveness outweigh the concern over policy distance. They test their hypotheses on a sample of all electorally active ethnic minorities in democracies from 1945 to 2004. The authors find support for their hypothesis that ethnic parties representing minorities that diverge in religious family from the majority are more likely to be included in governing coalitions than are ethnic minorities at large. It is interesting, however, that they also find that minority parties representing ethnic groups that differ in denomination from the majority are less likely to be included in governing coalitions.

Course
Other identifiers
Book Title
Keywords
Coalition politics, Ethnic minorities, Religion
Citation
Published Version (Please cite this version)