Are our memory predictions absolute or relative? : The effect of comparison on memory judgments

buir.advisorBesken, Miri
dc.contributor.authorKarademir, Derya
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-27T08:55:13Z
dc.date.available2017-01-27T08:55:13Z
dc.date.copyright2016-12
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.date.submitted2017-01-25
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of Psychology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 57-64).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe effect of divided attention on memory is well documented. However, its effects on memory predictions are not known. One of the aims of the present study was to investigate whether divided attention affects memory performance and prospective memory predictions. The other aim of the current study was to investigate whether people take into consideration the list composition while making memory predictions. In other words, in this study, we investigated whether the effect of divided attention on memory judgments is relative or absolute. In order to investigate these aims, we conducted two experiments. In both experiments, three separate groups were used in the study. One group only studied words under full attention instructions. The other group of participants studied words under divided attention instructions. A third group experienced both divided attention and full attention conditions in a mixed list. Then, these three groups were compared in terms of their actual memory and predicted memory performance. The results revealed no significant difference among these groups in terms of actual memory performance and memory predictions. The results were discussed in terms of findings, limitations and future suggestions.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Betül Özen (ozen@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 10136674.pdf: 627624 bytes, checksum: 745421d054436c2bce1339e5d61cb2c1 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 10136674.pdf: 627624 bytes, checksum: 745421d054436c2bce1339e5d61cb2c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Derya Karademiren_US
dc.format.extentx, 64 leaves : charts.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB155009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/32621
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDivided Attentionen_US
dc.subjectList Compositionen_US
dc.subjectJudgments of Learningsen_US
dc.subjectMetamemoryen_US
dc.titleAre our memory predictions absolute or relative? : The effect of comparison on memory judgmentsen_US
dc.title.alternativeHafıza tahminlerimiz mutlak mı yoksa göreceli midir? : karşılaştırmanın hafıza tahminlerimiz üzerine etkisien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorBilkent University
thesis.degree.levelMaster's
thesis.degree.nameMA (Master of Arts)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10136674.pdf
Size:
612.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: