Are our memory predictions absolute or relative? : The effect of comparison on memory judgments
buir.advisor | Besken, Miri | |
dc.contributor.author | Karademir, Derya | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-12 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-25 | |
dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of article. | en_US |
dc.description | Thesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of Psychology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2016. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 57-64). | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The effect of divided attention on memory is well documented. However, its effects on memory predictions are not known. One of the aims of the present study was to investigate whether divided attention affects memory performance and prospective memory predictions. The other aim of the current study was to investigate whether people take into consideration the list composition while making memory predictions. In other words, in this study, we investigated whether the effect of divided attention on memory judgments is relative or absolute. In order to investigate these aims, we conducted two experiments. In both experiments, three separate groups were used in the study. One group only studied words under full attention instructions. The other group of participants studied words under divided attention instructions. A third group experienced both divided attention and full attention conditions in a mixed list. Then, these three groups were compared in terms of their actual memory and predicted memory performance. The results revealed no significant difference among these groups in terms of actual memory performance and memory predictions. The results were discussed in terms of findings, limitations and future suggestions. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by Betül Özen (ozen@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 10136674.pdf: 627624 bytes, checksum: 745421d054436c2bce1339e5d61cb2c1 (MD5) | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-27T08:55:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 10136674.pdf: 627624 bytes, checksum: 745421d054436c2bce1339e5d61cb2c1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-01 | en |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Derya Karademir | en_US |
dc.format.extent | x, 64 leaves : charts. | en_US |
dc.identifier.itemid | B155009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/32621 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Divided Attention | en_US |
dc.subject | List Composition | en_US |
dc.subject | Judgments of Learnings | en_US |
dc.subject | Metamemory | en_US |
dc.title | Are our memory predictions absolute or relative? : The effect of comparison on memory judgments | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Hafıza tahminlerimiz mutlak mı yoksa göreceli midir? : karşılaştırmanın hafıza tahminlerimiz üzerine etkisi | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Psychology | |
thesis.degree.grantor | Bilkent University | |
thesis.degree.level | Master's | |
thesis.degree.name | MA (Master of Arts) |