Computer experiments to determine whether over-or under-counting necessarily affects the determination of difference in cell number between experimental groups

Date

2001-03-30

Authors

Heller, B.
Schweingruber, F.
Guvenc, D.
Heller, A.

Editor(s)

Advisor

Supervisor

Co-Advisor

Co-Supervisor

Instructor

Source Title

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Print ISSN

0165-0270

Electronic ISSN

1872-678X

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

91

Issue

1

Pages

91 - 99

Language

English

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Series

Abstract

Computer cell counting experiments were performed in order to examine the consequences of over- or under-counting. The three-dimensional reaggregate culture laboratory environment for cell counting was used as a model for computer simulation. The laboratory environment for aggregate and cell sizes, numbers and spatial placement in gelatin blocks was mimicked in the computer setup. However, in the computer, cell counting was set to be either ideally unbiased, or deliberately biased in regard to over- or under-counting so as to compare eventual results when using the various cell counting methods. It was found that there was no effect of the cell counting methods used in determining whether there was a significant difference in cell number between two experimental groups. In addition, it was found that under the conditions of these simulations, the optical disector method behaved similarly, on the average, as the ideal method of counting cell centers and in both of those cases, the average ratio between actual cell number in a flask and estimated number was close to 1.00. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Course

Other identifiers

Book Title

Citation