Using eye tracking to understand the impact of visual complexity and perceptual fluency on viewers’ aesthetic preferences

buir.advisorİmamoğlu, Çağrı
buir.co-advisorAcartürk, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorBeder, Dilara
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T13:36:25Z
dc.date.available2024-09-17T13:36:25Z
dc.date.copyright2024-09
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.date.submitted2024-09-11
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.): Bilkent University, Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2024.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 93-109).
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the interplay between cognitive styles, visual complexity, and aesthetic evaluations in environmental psychology and architectural design, utilizing Gestalt principles. Our research was divided into two studies. In Study I, we examined the aesthetic evaluations of 24 two-dimensional geometric stimuli, manipulated using the Gestalt principles of similarity based on color and shape differences, with 39 participants. In Study II, we focused on architectural façades and used 24 two-dimensional stimuli, manipulated through the Gestalt principles of similarity and proximity, to assess aesthetic evaluations with 79 participants. Participants were classified as Field Dependent or Field Independent using the Hidden Figures Test. Additionally, we collected their aesthetic evaluations through questionnaires, supported by eye-tracking data to assess visual attention. Study I revealed a U-shaped relationship between visual complexity and aesthetic evaluations, with both low and high complexity stimuli rated higher than medium complexity ones. Study II found an inverse relationship between complexity and aesthetic ratings, with simpler façades generally preferred. Gestalt principles significantly influenced aesthetic judgments, with shape-based similarity rated higher than color-based similarity for geometric designs, and proximity-based façades rated higher than similarity-based façades in architectural contexts. Although cognitive styles did not significantly impact overall aesthetic evaluations, nuanced differences were identified in the responses of Field Dependent participants when comparing proximity-based to similarity-based designs. Gaze metrics data indicated that higher complexity levels led to more fixations and shorter fixation durations, reflecting more extensive visual exploration. These findings offer insights into how cognitive styles, complexity, and Gestalt principles shape aesthetic perceptions, informing design practices to enhance user experience.
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by İlknur Sarıkaya (ilknur.sarikaya@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2024-09-17T13:36:25Z No. of bitstreams: 1 B162636.pdf: 3431560 bytes, checksum: 578a64fce621f3b30901a751086b4556 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-09-17T13:36:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 B162636.pdf: 3431560 bytes, checksum: 578a64fce621f3b30901a751086b4556 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024-09en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Dilara Beder
dc.format.extentxii, 135 leaves : illustrations, charts ; 30 cm.
dc.identifier.itemidB162636
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/115816
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEye tracking
dc.subjectComplexity
dc.subjectGestalt
dc.subjectAesthetic preferences
dc.subjectCognitive styles
dc.titleUsing eye tracking to understand the impact of visual complexity and perceptual fluency on viewers’ aesthetic preferences
dc.title.alternativeGörsel karmaşıklığın ve algısal akıcılığın izleyicilerin estetik tercihleri üzerindeki etkisini anlamak için göz takip sistemlerini kullanmak
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.disciplineInterior Architecture and Environmental Design
thesis.degree.grantorBilkent University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.namePh.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
B162636.pdf
Size:
3.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: