Conscientious objection in Turkey: investigation of the possibility of defining the concept as a general objection category
| buir.advisor | İnce, Başak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Çelik, Uğurcan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-06T08:54:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-09-06T08:54:18Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-08 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-09-04 | |
| dc.department | Department of Political Science and Public Administration | |
| dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of article. | |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's): Bilkent University, Department of Political Science, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2023. | |
| dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 111-117). | |
| dc.description.abstract | Conscientious objection (CO) entered Turkish literature in 1990 as refusal of conscription. Since then, the reasons for COr’s objections have diversified. In the literature, CO has two definitions: narrow and broad. According to the narrow definition, CO is refusing conscription. The broad definition can be summarized as an agent's objection to complying with a rule, principle, or social norm for various reasons. As a general category of objection, CO is conceptualized in the literature comparatively with civil disobedience. It is defined as a moral objection to obtaining a personal exemption, while civil disobedience is considered a political act of violation of the law by a collectivity to get the law changed/revised/abrogated. CO studies in Turkish literature have been limited to the narrow definition of the concept, and the subject is discussed concerning citizenship, militarism, actors, and law. This thesis deals with the problem of the limitation of approach in the Turkish literature on the concept. In this respect, it analyzes whether CO can be conceptualized as a general objection category and not limited to refusing conscription. Two methods are used in this study: a content analysis of the Amargi journal, published by an anarchist group, including COrs, in Izmir between 1991-1994, in which CO is frequently discussed, and semi-structured in-depth interviews with 12 COrs. In the conclusion, I argue that the concept is considered in a broader context even by COrs who reject conscription. | |
| dc.description.degree | M.A. | |
| dc.description.statementofresponsibility | by Uğurcan Çelik | |
| dc.format.extent | ix, 126 leaves ; 30 cm. | |
| dc.identifier.itemid | B162489 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11693/113826 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | Bilkent University | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Conscientious objection | |
| dc.subject | Amargi | |
| dc.subject | Civil disobedience | |
| dc.subject | General objection category | |
| dc.subject | Turkey | |
| dc.title | Conscientious objection in Turkey: investigation of the possibility of defining the concept as a general objection category | |
| dc.title.alternative | Türkiye'de vicdani ret: kavramın genel bir itiraz kategorisi olarak tanımlanması olasılığının araştırılması | |
| dc.type | Thesis |