Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering?
dc.citation.epage | 349 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 340 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 44 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Doganay, S. M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sayek, S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Taskin, F. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T11:02:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T11:02:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Economics | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Global efforts to identify strategies for sustainable economic growth and development underline the need for understanding important links between environmental policies and international trade. In this paper, by constructing an environmental efficiency index for 111 countries from 1980 to 2009, we are able to empirically test for one such link. An improvement in the environmental efficiency index in terms of carbon dioxide emissions reflects a decrease in the cost of efforts to mitigate the environmental costs associated with growth. Countries that improve their environmental efficiency are found to experience strong international trade effects, both through increased exports and increased imports. While the positive link between efficiency improvements and exports is supportive of the Porter hypothesis, the positive link between efficiency improvements and imports is supportive of strong positive income effects on account of environmental efforts. These results, which are robust to alternative estimation strategies, lend strong support to global efforts to improve countries' environmental efficiencies. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T11:02:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-6181 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0140-9883 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/26599 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.004 | en_US |
dc.source.title | Energy Economics | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental efficiency index | en_US |
dc.subject | Gravity model | en_US |
dc.subject | Porter hypothesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Carbon dioxide | en_US |
dc.subject | Economic analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Global warming | en_US |
dc.subject | International trade | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental efficiency | en_US |
dc.subject | F14 | en_US |
dc.subject | F18 | en_US |
dc.subject | Gravity model | en_US |
dc.subject | Porter hypothesis | en_US |
dc.subject | Efficiency | en_US |
dc.title | Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Is environmental efficiency trade inducing or trade hindering.pdf
- Size:
- 379.25 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version