Virtue and moral obligation
| buir.contributor.author | Bergès, Sandrine | |
| buir.contributor.orcid | Bergès, Sandrine|0000-0001-6904-3998 | |
| dc.citation.epage | 266 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 254 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bergès, Sandrine | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Detlefsen, K. | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Shapiro, L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-21T07:46:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-21T07:46:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-06-19 | |
| dc.department | Department of Philosophy | |
| dc.description.abstract | Although Early Modern male philosophers arguably moved away from virtue ethics toward theories of obligation, it is less clearly true of women philosophers of that period. I argue that Early Modern women philosophers in France and England mixed elements from virtue ethics and theories of moral obligation in order to theorize their moral experience. I look at Christine de Pizan, Jacqueline Pascal, Catherine Trotter Cockburn, and Mary Wollstonecraft. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4324/9781315450001-24 | |
| dc.identifier.eisbn | 9781315450001 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11693/115040 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Routledge | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | The Routledge Handbook of Women and Early Modern European Philosophy | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315450001-24 | |
| dc.title | Virtue and moral obligation | |
| dc.type | Book Chapter |