Effect of prior knowledge on the illusory truth effect and memory and metacognitive processes underlying this illusion

buir.advisorBesken, Miri
dc.contributor.authorGizem, Filiz
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-16T11:33:30Z
dc.date.available2021-08-16T11:33:30Z
dc.date.copyright2021-07
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.date.submitted2021-08-05
dc.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Department of Psychology, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2021.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 78-82).en_US
dc.description.abstractRepeated information typically produces higher truth ratings than novel information. This is called the illusory truth effect. Since this illusion can be obtained with various research materials, the repetition of the information is considered as the driving force of the illusion rather than the content, but whether the effect depends on familiarity or recollection is controversial. The present study aimed to investigate how the novelty of the content may also contribute to this effect through familiarity versus recollection. In a series of three experiments, participants were presented with categorical information about novel pseudowords in an initial phase. Then, they were presented with either congruent or incongruent details about the category of the items. It was hypothesized that if familiarity drives the effect, just the mere repetition should increase truth ratings for all old items. Experiment 1 showed that the mere repetition of some cues from previously studied category statements did not produce the illusory truth effect. In Experiment 2, an additional phase of retrieval practice to teach the categorical information about the pseudowords produced a robust illusory truth effect. The results of Experiment 2 showed that when participants learned new information effectively, they made truth assessments by considering the congruence of the semantic details they remembered with existing statements. Experiment 3 aimed to understand how the time interval affects familiarity and recollection processes within the framework of the current research. Contrary to the results of previous studies, Experiment 3 did not find a pattern in which recollection turned into familiarity over time, but the illusory truth effect persisted over time. The results and future work are discussed in the context of referential theory and the illusory truth effect literature.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.A.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Gizem Filizen_US
dc.format.extentxiv, 99 leaves : illustrations ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB105164
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/76435
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectThe illusory truth effecten_US
dc.subjectFamiliarityen_US
dc.subjectRecollectionen_US
dc.subjectPrior knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectReferential theoryen_US
dc.titleEffect of prior knowledge on the illusory truth effect and memory and metacognitive processes underlying this illusionen_US
dc.title.alternativeÖnceden edinilmiş bilginin yanıltıcı doğruluk etkisine olan katkısı ve bu etkinin altında yatan bellek ve üstbellek süreçlerien_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: