(In)efficiency and equitability of equilibrium outcomes in a family of bargaining games

buir.contributor.authorKaragözoğlu, Emin
buir.contributor.authorSağlam, Çağrı
buir.contributor.orcidKaragözoğlu, Emin|0000-0003-2442-6949
dc.citation.epage19en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.contributor.authorKaragözoğlu, Emin
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, K.
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Çağrı
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T13:29:28Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T13:29:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-21
dc.departmentDepartment of Economicsen_US
dc.description.abstractWe construct a parametric family of (modified) divide-the-dollar games: when there is excess demand, some portion of the dollar may disappear and the remaining portion is distributed in a bankruptcy problem. In two extremes, this game family captures the standard divide-the-dollar game of Nash (Econometrica 21:128–140, 1953) (when the whole dollar vanishes) and the game studied in Ashlagi et al. (Math Soc Sci 63:228–233, 2012) (when the whole dollar remains) as special cases. We first show that in all interior members of our game family, all Nash equilibria are inefficient under the proportional rule if there are ‘too many’ players in the game. Moreover, in any interior member of the game family, the inefficiency increases as the number of players increases, and the whole surplus vanishes as the number of players goes to infinity. On the other hand, we show that any bankruptcy rule that satisfies certain normatively appealing axioms induces a unique and efficient Nash equilibrium in which everyone demands and receives an equal share of the dollar. The constrained equal awards rule is one such rule.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Evrim Ergin (eergin@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2023-02-16T13:29:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 (In)efficiency_and_equitability_of_equilibrium_outcomes_in_a_family_of_bargaining_games.pdf: 1246253 bytes, checksum: 2e8b5e172801eb6d729d74856a91834f (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-02-16T13:29:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 (In)efficiency_and_equitability_of_equilibrium_outcomes_in_a_family_of_bargaining_games.pdf: 1246253 bytes, checksum: 2e8b5e172801eb6d729d74856a91834f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-11-21en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00182-022-00814-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-7276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/111467
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-022-00814-3en_US
dc.source.titleInternational Journal of Game Theoryen_US
dc.subjectBankruptcy problemen_US
dc.subjectBargainingen_US
dc.subjectConstrained equal awards ruleen_US
dc.subjectDivide-the-dollar gameen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectEqual divisionen_US
dc.subjectProportional ruleen_US
dc.title(In)efficiency and equitability of equilibrium outcomes in a family of bargaining gamesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
(In)efficiency_and_equitability_of_equilibrium_outcomes_in_a_family_of_bargaining_games.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: