Should we fear quantum torment?
dc.citation.epage | 259 | en_US |
dc.citation.issueNumber | 3 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 249 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 25 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Aranyosi, I. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T09:45:00Z | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T09:45:00Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The prospect, in terms of subjective expectations, of immortality under the no-collapse interpretation of quantum mechanics is certain, as pointed out by several authors, both physicists and, more recently, philosophers. The argument, known as quantum suicide, or quantum immortality, has received some critical discussion, but there hasn't been any questioning of David Lewis's point that there is a terrifying corollary to the argument, namely, that we should expect to live forever in a crippled, more and more damaged state, that barely sustains life. This is the prospect of eternal quantum torment. Based on some empirical facts, I argue for a conclusion that is much more reassuring than Lewis's terrible scenario. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T09:45:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00540.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0034-0006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/21341 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2012.00540.x | en_US |
dc.source.title | Ratio | en_US |
dc.title | Should we fear quantum torment? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Should we fear quantum torment.pdf
- Size:
- 56.82 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version