Hannah Arendt's conceptualizations of evil

Available
The embargo period has ended, and this item is now available.

Date

2016-01

Editor(s)

Advisor

Alexander, James

Supervisor

Co-Advisor

Co-Supervisor

Instructor

Source Title

Print ISSN

Electronic ISSN

Publisher

Volume

Issue

Pages

Language

English

Type

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Attention Stats
Usage Stats
3
views
139
downloads

Series

Abstract

We owe to Hannah Arendt the notion of “radical evil” and “the banality of evil”. The word “evil” appears with a surprising frequency in Arendt’s work, even though she never wrote a theory of evil and she was not a moralist. Arendt was not a systematic thinker. In this thesis I reconstruct Hannah Arendt’s accounts of evil by presenting them in relation to other fundamental concepts for which Arendt is well-known. My argument is that in order to understand the many nuances of the concept of evil that feature in Hannah Arendt’s body of work we need to look at the relation between evil and freedom. As Arendt’s two notions of freedom (I-can of the new beginning and I-will of the freedom of will) point towards two different conceptualizations of evil (radicality of evil and the banality of evil), it is the reality of evil which serves as the linchpin that helps us see the relation that exists between these two conceptualizations.

Course

Other identifiers

Book Title

Degree Discipline

Political Science

Degree Level

Doctoral

Degree Name

Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)