Reassessing the tımar system : the case study of Vidin (1455-1693)

buir.supervisorÖzel, Oktay
dc.contributor.authorSoyudoğan, Muhsin
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T18:16:08Z
dc.date.available2016-01-08T18:16:08Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.): The Department of History, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2012.en_US
dc.description Cataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references leaves 251-277.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is based on a long durée approach and utilizes micro historical analyses to reconsider the nature and transformation of the timar system through a case study of the sancak of Vidin. It presents a method that I call timar tracking which allows a systematic analysis of various primary sources such as; mufassal, icmal, ruznamçe, cebe, tahvil and yoklama registers, which facilitates a better evaluation of the reliability of sources and a wider picture of the issue. One of the main concerns of the study is to question the conventional understanding of the timar system that has been mainly built upon the terminology of the sixteenth century. The argument offered here is that the timar system evolved into its orthodox form after 1530. This transition is simply described as the change from two-layered to tripartite form of the timar system. Moreover, the transformation of the timar system, so its degeneration, is handled as a matter of systemic paradoxes. The argument is that the development of the system also made it vulnerable. In this sense the process of the hassification, meaning the expansion and development of state/sultan’s lands, both contributed to the further development of the timar system and made it dissolve. Similarly, centralization policies of the state resulted in the timar system being highly controlled by the government; but those same policies actually led to the central state losing control over the system. This occurred through what I term the abstraction of the timar is a conceptualization of the paradoxical transformation of the system. Lastly, the timar system is approached as one of several components of a general Ottoman complex/system. What I call military sphere is the area on which the timar system was built. The three stages of the transformation of the organization of this sphere, as well as, the inter-relations between the other spheres are discussed in detail. Finally, it is concluded that the military sphere was occupied by other spheres, which occurred in Vidin through hassification and privatization.
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-01-08T18:16:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 0006041.pdf: 4928018 bytes, checksum: 363784abf846a1fe940a5b824be39eee (MD5)en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Muhsin Soyudoğanen_US
dc.format.extentxiv, 306 leaves, maps ; 30 cmen_US
dc.identifier.itemidB133359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/15290
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectThe timar system
dc.subjectTimar tracking
dc.subjectSystemic paradoxes
dc.subjectMilitary sphere
dc.subjectAdministrative transformation
dc.subjectThe Ottoman army
dc.subjectVidin
dc.titleReassessing the tımar system : the case study of Vidin (1455-1693)en_US
dc.title.alternativeTimar sisteminin yeniden değerlendirilmesi: Vidin örneği (1455-1693)
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineHistory
thesis.degree.grantorBilkent University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.namePh.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
B133359.pdf
Size:
4.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format