A comparative analysis of critical infrastructure cyber security policies: best practices from the US, EU and Turkey

buir.advisorÖzdamar, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorDüveroğlu, Efe
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T05:43:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T05:43:38Z
dc.date.copyright2020-06
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.date.submitted2020-06-17
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.): Bilkent University, Graduate Program in Energy Economics, Policy and Security, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2020.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 119-134).en_US
dc.description.abstractCritical infrastructures are the physical and virtual systems forming the basis of modern societies and they are essential in ensuring national prosperity. Even though the importance of such infrastructures could not be grasped by states and international organizations in the beginning, an increasing number of cyber threats targeting critical infrastructure systems is becoming the reason behind the acceleration of the engagement of critical infrastructure protection as an agenda item as seen in the United States and the European Union. In Turkey, the field of critical infrastructure policy is still in its infancy. This thesis compares the developments of critical infrastructure security in the United States, the European Union and Turkey through an investigation of definitional, legal, institutional and economic practices relating to critical infrastructure. While doing so, this thesis aims to reveal Turkey's current status in the field of critical infrastructure protection. In this regard, this thesis also analyzes how successful critical infrastructure security policies have been in Turkey. According to the findings of this thesis, Turkey is far behind the United States and the European Union in the field as a result of institutional and legal gaps that prevent the development of infrastructure protection. The policy initiatives which Turkey has to pursue are also discussed in the thesis.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Betül Özen (ozen@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2020-06-19T05:43:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 10337584.pdf: 954015 bytes, checksum: 95e5db5c85423fac17a075922243afb0 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2020-06-19T05:43:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 10337584.pdf: 954015 bytes, checksum: 95e5db5c85423fac17a075922243afb0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-06en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Efe Düveroğluen_US
dc.format.extentviii, 135 leaves ; 30 cm.en_US
dc.identifier.itemidB160310
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/53653
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectCritical infrastructure protectionen_US
dc.subjectCyber securityen_US
dc.subjectPolicy success analysisen_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of critical infrastructure cyber security policies: best practices from the US, EU and Turkeyen_US
dc.title.alternativeKritik altyapı siber güvenlik politikalarinin karşılaştırmalı analizi: ABD, AB ve Türkiye’den en iyi uygulamalaren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEconomics
thesis.degree.grantorBilkent University
thesis.degree.levelMaster's
thesis.degree.nameMA (Master of Arts)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10337584.pdf
Size:
931.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: