Judicial review and the defence of (democratic) constitutionality: a critique of the argument from disagreement
dc.citation.epage | 42 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 7 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Vinx, Lars | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Carbonell, F. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Menendez, A. J. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Fossum, J. E. | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Oslo-Norway | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-12T08:29:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-12T08:29:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-09 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description | Chapter 1 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this paper is to offer a defence of the practice of constitutional review from the point of view of a theory of democratic legitimacy. I will develop this defence by engaging with the strongest criticism to date of the practice of constitutional review: Jeremy Waldron’s and Richard Bellamy’s argument that constitutional review violates the principle of democratic equality, respect for which is a necessary condition of legitimate political decision-taking in a pluralist society characterized by reasonable disagreement about rights. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by Zeynep Aykut (zeynepay@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2019-07-12T08:29:41Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Judicial_review_and_the_defence_of_democratic_constitutionality_a_critique_of_the_argument_from_disagreement.pdf: 174910 bytes, checksum: c3fcc7d9f4a58fe485484961c087a1e0 (MD5) | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2019-07-12T08:29:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Judicial_review_and_the_defence_of_democratic_constitutionality_a_critique_of_the_argument_from_disagreement.pdf: 174910 bytes, checksum: c3fcc7d9f4a58fe485484961c087a1e0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-09 | en |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 9788293137832 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9788293137337 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/52251 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oslo | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hope, reluctance or fear: the democratic consequences of the case law of the European Court of justice | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | ARENA Report;5/11 | |
dc.title | Judicial review and the defence of (democratic) constitutionality: a critique of the argument from disagreement | en_US |
dc.type | Book Chapter | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Judicial_review_and_the_defence_of_democratic_constitutionality_a_critique_of_the_argument_from_disagreement.pdf
- Size:
- 170.81 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: