Robustness of GaN on SiC low-noise amplifiers in common source and cascode configurations for X-band applications

buir.contributor.authorNawaz, Muhammad Imran
buir.contributor.authorZafar, Salahuddin
buir.contributor.authorGürdal, Armağan
buir.contributor.authorAkoğlu, Büşra Çankaya
buir.contributor.orcidNawaz, Muhammad Imran|0000-0002-8387-9000
buir.contributor.orcidZafar, Salahuddin|0000-0002-5212-9602
buir.contributor.orcidGürdal, Armağan|0000-0002-8008-7438
buir.contributor.orcidAkoğlu, Büşra Çankaya|0000-0001-5680-1649
dc.citation.epage4163
dc.citation.issueNumber8
dc.citation.spage4148
dc.citation.volumeNumber52
dc.contributor.authorNawaz, Muhammad Imran
dc.contributor.authorZafar, Salahuddin
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Armağan
dc.contributor.authorAkoğlu, Büşra Çankaya
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-27T11:13:25Z
dc.date.available2025-02-27T11:13:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
dc.departmentNanotechnology Research Center (NANOTAM)
dc.departmentDepartment of Physics
dc.departmentInstitute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology (UNAM)
dc.description.abstractCascode HEMTs exhibit high gain and broadband performance. Promising reverse transmission makes matching networks simpler and insensitive to impedance on either side of the HEMT. On the other hand, common source (CS) HEMTs with intentional small inductance at the source provide simultaneous match for optimum noise and input impedance. This paper provides a performance comparison of 4 x 50 mu m cascode HEMTs-based low -noise amplifier and 4 x 50 mu m CS HEMTs-based low -noise amplifiers with specific emphasis on robustness, including survivability and reverse recovery time (RRT). Cascode LNA survives an input power of 33 dBm while CS LNA handles 30 dBm power, each having a 1 k Omega passive limiting resistor on the gate bias line. RRT of cascode LNA is also better. Better survivability and RRT for cascode LNA are attributed to its HEMT's stacked configuration. The designs of LNAs are described, along with their small -signal, noise, and large -signal characteristics in the X -band. Cascode LNA has a better input match, while CS LNA has a better output match. Gains are comparable, while CS LNA has better P1dB at higher band edge frequency. The noise figure for both LNAs is less than 1.9 dB, with CS LNA having a slight edge over cascode. This study benefits RF designers in choosing appropriate HEMT topology as per application for designing robust low -noise amplifiers.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cta.3937
dc.identifier.eissn1097-007X
dc.identifier.issn0098-9886
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/116927
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cta.3937
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.titleInternational Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications
dc.subjectCascode
dc.subjectGaN LNA
dc.subjectReverse recovery time
dc.subjectSurvivability
dc.titleRobustness of GaN on SiC low-noise amplifiers in common source and cascode configurations for X-band applications
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Robustness_of_GaN_on_SiC_low-noise_amplifiers_in_commonsource_and_cascode_configurations_for_X-band_applications.pdf
Size:
2.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: