When beetles kept thudding : Geoffrey Keating's treatment of the foreign authors of his preface to Foras Feasa Ar Éirinn

Simple item page
buir.advisorLeighton, Cadoc D.
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Cihan
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T20:18:21Z
dc.date.available2016-01-08T20:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentDepartment of Historyen_US
dc.descriptionAnkara : The Department of History, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's) -- Bilkent University, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references leaves 107-113.en_US
dc.description.abstractRecent scholarship has convincingly revolutionised the interpretation of Geoffrey Keating’s Foras Feasa ar Éirinn by introducing hitherto unregarded concepts of Renaissance humanism and of Counter-Reformation thought to the study of the Tipperary scholar-priest and his outstanding historical compilation. However, hardly any serious work has been carried out with regard to Keating’s polemical preface, written under the influence of these intellectual movements. The purpose of the present dissertation is to examine Keating’s disputes with a group of Tudor authors, from Stanihurst to Davies, whom he cites and challenges in this polemical preface to Foras Feasa. Keating strove to merge Irishness with Catholicism and provided the Irish Catholic nobility, denominated as the Éireannaigh, with a renewed origin myth to enhance their illustrious character. The exclusion of the aforementioned Tudor authors and the political and religious groups which they represented from the imaginary community of the Éireannaigh has tempted Irish historians to attempt to place Keating’s polemical preface in early Stuart political history. Nevertheless, in comparison to his political ideology, Keating’s methodological concerns enjoy a more prominent place in the refutation of the authors to whom Gaelic Ireland was foreign. By virtue of these methodological concerns, Keating is also comparable to contemporary antiquarians/historians, who produced similar national histories in the vernacular in the sixteenth and the seventeenth centuries. A further area of comparison, overlapping with this, is found in the historiography of the Catholic Reformation.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.A.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityDemir, Cihanen_US
dc.embargo.release2016-09-18
dc.format.extentix, 113 leavesen_US
dc.identifier.itemidB148391
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/18334
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeoffrey Keatingen_US
dc.subjectCatholic Reformationen_US
dc.subjectIrish Catholic Historiographyen_US
dc.subjectRenaissance Historiographyen_US
dc.subjectTudor Irelanden_US
dc.subjectStuart Irelanden_US
dc.subject.lccDA930 .D45 2014en_US
dc.subject.lcshCounter Reformation--Ireland.en_US
dc.subject.lcshReformation--Ireland.en_US
dc.titleWhen beetles kept thudding : Geoffrey Keating's treatment of the foreign authors of his preface to Foras Feasa Ar Éirinnen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10050885.pdf
Size:
805.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version
Download

Collections

Dept. of History - Master's degree