Browsing by Subject "Majority voting"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Open Access
Comparative analysis of different approaches to target differentiation and localization with sonar
(Elsevier, 2003) Barshan, B.; Ayrulu, B.
This study compares the performances of different methods for the differentiation and localization of commonly encountered features in indoor environments. Differentiation of such features is of interest for intelligent systems in a variety of applications such as system control based on acoustic signal detection and identification, map building, navigation, obstacle avoidance, and target tracking. Different representations of amplitude and time-of-2ight measurement patterns experimentally acquired from a real sonar system are processed. The approaches compared in this study include the target differentiation algorithm, Dempster-Shafer evidential reasoning, different kinds of voting schemes, statistical pattern recognition techniques (k-nearest neighbor classifier, kernel estimator, parameterized density estimator, linear discriminant analysis, and fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm), and artificial neural networks. The neural networks are trained with different input signal representations obtained usingpre-processing techniques such as discrete ordinary and fractional Fourier, Hartley and wavelet transforms, and Kohonen's self-organizing feature map. The use of neural networks trained with the back-propagation algorithm, usually with fractional Fourier transform or wavelet pre-processing results in near perfect differentiation, around 85% correct range estimation and around 95% correct azimuth estimation, which would be satisfactory in a wide range of applications. © 2002 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Open Access
Neural network-based target differentiation using sonar for robotics applications
(IEEE, 2000-08) Barshan, B.; Ayrulu, B.; Utete, S. W.
This study investigates the processing of sonar signals using neural networks for robust differentiation of commonly encountered features in indoor robot environments. The neural network can differentiate more targets with higher accuracy, improving on previously reported methods. It achieves this by exploiting the identifying features in the differential amplitude and time-of-flight (TOF) characteristics of these targets. Robustness tests indicate that the amplitude information is more crucial than TOF for reliable operation. The study suggests wider use of neural networks and amplitude information in sonar-based mobile robotics.
Open Access
Reliability measure assignment to sonar for robust target differentiation
(Elsevier, 2002) Ayrulu, B.; Barshan, B.
This article addresses the use of evidential reasoning and majority voting in multi-sensor decision making for target differentiation using sonar sensors. Classification of target primitives which constitute the basic building blocks of typical surfaces in uncluttered robot environments has been considered. Multiple sonar sensors placed at geographically different sensing sites make decisions about the target type based on their measurement patterns. Their decisions are combined to reach a group decision through Dempster-Shafer evidential reasoning and majority voting. The sensing nodes view the targets at different ranges and angles so that they have different degrees of reliability. Proper accounting for these different reliabilities has the potential to improve decision making compared to simple uniform treatment of the sensors. Consistency problems arising in majority voting are addressed with a view to achieving high classification performance. This is done by introducing preference ordering among the possible target types and assigning reliability measures (which essentially serve as weights) to each decision-making node based on the target range and azimuth estimates it makes and the belief values it assigns to possible target types. The results bring substantial improvement over evidential reasoning and simple majority voting by reducing the target misclassification rate. © 2002 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.