Browsing by Author "Otman, A. S."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Comparison of different balance scales in Parkinson's disease(Turkey Association of Physiotherapists, 2009) Gündüz, A. G.; Otman, A. S.; Kose, N.; Bilgin, S.; Elibol, B.Purpose: The main purpose of our study is finding out whether different methods used in evaluating balance are reliable and valid for Parkinson Disease. Material and methods: In the study, thirty idiopathic Parkinson patients were evaluated by Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Performance Oriented Balance and Gait Scale, and clinical balance and mobility tests at their "off" and "on" periods. Additionally; the patients were evaluated by motor evaluation part of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale. All the evaluation tests were repeated 7 days after the first applications. Results: Comparisons revealed that all the balance evaluation tests were reliable and valid for Parkinson patients. On the other hand, it was also revealed that, Berg Balance Scale is more reliable (ICC=0.99) and showing higher correlation with motor part of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (r=-0.75, p<0.05) and Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale (r=-0.75/0.71, p<0.05). Conclusion: As a result of our study, that Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Performance Oriented Balance and Gait Scale, clinical balance and mobility tests can be applied to Parkinson disease patients reliably, and among these tests Berg Balance Scale gives more comprehensive information regarding evaluation of different parameters of balance.Item Open Access Functional mobility, depressive symptoms, level of independence, and quality of life of the elderly living at home and in the nursing home(Elsevier Inc., 2009) Karakaya, M. G.; Bilgin, S. C.; Ekici, G.; Köse, N.; Otman, A. S.Objectives: To compare functional mobility, depressive symptoms, level of independence, and quality of life of the elderly living at home and in the nursing home. Design: A prospectively designed, comparative study. Setting: A nursing home and a university hospital department. Participants: In this study, 33 elderly living in a nursing home and 25 elderly living at home, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate, were included. Measurements: Sociodemographic characteristics were recorded. Functional mobility (Timed Up & Go Test), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), level of independence (Kahoku Aging Longitudinal Study Scale), and quality of life (Visual Analogue Scale) scores were compared between the groups. Results: Functional mobility and independence level of the nursing home residents were higher than the home-dwelling elderly (95% CI: -4.88, -0.29 and 0.41, 6.30, respectively), but they had more depressive symptoms (95% CI: 0.30, 5.45), and their level of QoL was lower (95% CI: -15.55, -2.93). Conclusion: These findings are thought to be important and of benefit for health care professionals and caregivers as indicating the areas that need to be supported for the elderly living at home (functional mobility and independence) and in the nursing home (depressive symptoms and quality of life). © 2009 American Medical Directors Association.