Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar`ın şiir eleştirisinde Avrupa merkezlilik
Author(s)
Advisor
Oğuzertem, SühaDate
2006Publisher
Bilkent University
Language
English
Type
ThesisItem Usage Stats
274
views
views
108
downloads
downloads
Abstract
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpınar (1901-62), who was one of the most original writers
of modern Turkish literature, especially with his novels and poems, had also
contributed to Turkish literary studies by various articles, essays, and his well-known
history of the nineteenth-century Turkish literature. In his articles and essays,
Tanpınar placed special emphasis on the genre of poetry and interpreted the
development of Turkish literature by putting poetry in the center.
This thesis aims to analyze Tanpınar’s writings about poetry in general, and
Ottoman poetry and Yahya Kemal Beyatlı (1884-1958) in particular, and to explore
his conception of fine arts and his Eurocentric approach.
In the first part, entitled “An Overview of Tanpınar’s Criticism of Poetry”, a
brief chronological outline of the body of his writings about “Criticism”, “Poetry”,
“Ottoman poetry”, and “Yahya Kemal” is provided.
The second part of the thesis, entitled “Elements of Tanpınar’s Criticism of
Poetry”, consists of two subsections: “Critical Interpretation According to Fine Arts”
and “Constructing Continuity in Poetic Language: Selectivity”. The first subsection
explores Tanpınar’s understanding of poetry as a fine art and his definition of it in
terms of the characteristics of the fine arts. The second subsection discusses
Tanpınar’s re-construction of a “classical” tradition by an intentional selection of
poets from Yunus Emre to Yahya Kemal in the context of poetic language and his
Eurocentric perspective.
Tanpınar re-constructs this line of continuity by selecting verses, couplets,
and poems according to European literatures, especially French literary norms, while
valuing them with the conceptions of European arts, and finally making the
mentioned line “Europeanized”. At the same time, he “orientalizes” the Ottoman
poetic tradition and makes modern Turkish poetry subordinate to it, with the
exception of Yahya Kemal.