Risk-averse multi-armed bandit problem

Available
The embargo period has ended, and this item is now available.

Date

2021-08

Editor(s)

Advisor

Çavuş İyigün, Özlem

Supervisor

Co-Advisor

Co-Supervisor

Instructor

Source Title

Print ISSN

Electronic ISSN

Publisher

Volume

Issue

Pages

Language

English

Type

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Attention Stats
Usage Stats
20
views
58
downloads

Series

Abstract

In classical multi-armed bandit problem, the aim is to find a policy maximizing the expected total reward, implicitly assuming that the decision maker is risk-neutral. On the other hand, the decision makers are risk-averse in some real life applications. In this study, we design a new setting for the classical multi-armed bandit problem (MAB) based on the concept of dynamic risk measures, where the aim is to find a policy with the best risk adjusted total discounted outcome. We provide theoretical analysis of MAB with respect to this novel setting, and propose two different priority-index heuristics giving risk-averse allocation indices with structures similar to Gittins index. The first proposed heuristic is based on Lagrangian duality and the indices are expressed as the Lagrangian multiplier corresponding to the activation constraint. In the second part, we present a theoretical analysis based on Whittle’s retirement problem and propose a gener-alized version of restart-in-state formulation of the Gittins index to compute the proposed risk-averse allocation indices. Finally, as a practical application of the proposed methods, we focus on optimal design of clinical trials and we apply our risk-averse MAB approach to perform risk-averse treatment allocation based on a Bayesian Bernoulli model. We evaluate the performance of our approach against other allocation rules, including fixed randomization.

Course

Other identifiers

Book Title

Degree Discipline

Industrial Engineering

Degree Level

Doctoral

Degree Name

Ph.D. (Doctor of Philosophy)

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)