Traffic engineering and regenerator placement in GMPLS networks with restoration
dc.citation.epage | 174 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 163 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 4868 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yetginer, Emre | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Karasan, Ezhan | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Boston, MA, United States | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T11:57:07Z | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T11:57:07Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering | en_US |
dc.description | Date of Conference: 29 July-1 August 2002 | en_US |
dc.description | Conference Name: ITCom 2002: The Convergence of Information Technologies and Communications, 2002 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper we study regenerator placement and traffic engineering of restorable paths in Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) networks. Regenerators are necessary in optical networks due to transmission impairments. We study a network architecture where there are regenerators at selected nodes and we propose two heuristic algorithms for the regenerator placement problem. Performances of these algorithms in terms of required number of regenerators and computational complexity are evaluated. In this network architecture with sparse regeneration, offline computation of working and restoration paths is studied with bandwidth reservation and path rerouting as the restoration scheme. We study two approaches for selecting working and restoration paths from a set of candidate paths and formulate each method as an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) problem. Traffic uncertainty model is developed in order to compare these methods based on their robustness with respect to changing traffic patterns. Traffic engineering methods are compared based on number of additional demands due to traffic uncertainty that can be carried. Regenerator placement algorithms are also evaluated from a traffic engineering point of view. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T11:57:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1117/12.475266 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0277-786X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/27583 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | SPIE | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.475266 | en_US |
dc.source.title | Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 4868, Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks II | en_US |
dc.subject | GMPLS | en_US |
dc.subject | Regenerator placement | en_US |
dc.subject | Restoration | en_US |
dc.subject | Traffic engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Algorithms | en_US |
dc.subject | Computational complexity | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer architecture | en_US |
dc.subject | Heuristic methods | en_US |
dc.title | Traffic engineering and regenerator placement in GMPLS networks with restoration | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Traffic engineering and regenerator placement in GMPLS networks with restoration.pdf
- Size:
- 169.79 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version