Influence of complexity and Gestalt principles on aesthetic preferences for building façades: An eye tracking study

buir.contributor.authorBeder, Dilara
buir.contributor.authorİmamoğlu, Çağrı
buir.contributor.orcidBeder, Dilara|0000-0002-0335-0108
buir.contributor.orcidİmamoğlu, Çağrı|0000-0001-5800-5785
dc.citation.epage22
dc.citation.issueNumber2
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volumeNumber17
dc.contributor.authorBeder, Dilara
dc.contributor.authorPelowski, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorİmamoğlu, Çağrı
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-26T08:20:07Z
dc.date.available2025-02-26T08:20:07Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-09
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
dc.description.abstractBuildings are an integral part of our physical environment and have aesthetic significance with respect to the organizational integrity of architectural elements. While Gestalt principles are essential in design education, their relationship with architectural features remains understudied. The present study explored how Gestalt principles and complexity levels influence evaluations of building façades through the use of questionnaires and eye tracking. Twenty-four two-dimensional black and white façade drawings, manipulated using selected Gestalt principles (similarity and proximity) to achieve different levels of complexity (low, medium & high), were presented to 79 participants. The results suggested a negative linear relationship between aesthetic ratings and complexity levels across selected Gestalt principles. In addition, as expected, participants had the highest number of fixations, shortest fixation durations, and lowest aesthetic ratings for higher levels of complexity. Results involving Gestalt principles revealed that proximity-based designs received higher aesthetic ratings, demanded less time, elicited lower number of fixations, and resulted in shorter fixation durations. Conversely, similarity-based designs received lower aesthetic ratings, demanded more time, elicited higher number of fixations, and resulted in longer fixation durations. These findings offer insights into architectural aesthetic experiences and inform future research directions.
dc.identifier.doi10.16910/jemr.17.2.4
dc.identifier.eissn1995-8692
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/116862
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherBern Open Publishing
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.2.4
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0 DEED (Attribution 4.0 International)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.titleJournal of Eye Movement Research
dc.subjectEye tracking
dc.subjectEye movement
dc.subjectVisual perception
dc.subjectComplexity
dc.subjectGestalt
dc.subjectAesthetic preferences
dc.subjectFaçade design
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.titleInfluence of complexity and Gestalt principles on aesthetic preferences for building façades: An eye tracking study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Influence_of_complexity_and_Gestalt_principles_on_aesthetic_preferences_for_building_façades_An_eye_tracking_study.pdf
Size:
7.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: