Chronic pain and selective attention to pain arousing daily activity pictures : evidence from an eye tracking study

buir.contributor.authorKhatibi, Ali
dc.citation.epage478en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber6en_US
dc.citation.spage467en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber8en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahmoodi-Aghdam, Masoumehen_US
dc.contributor.authorDehghani, Mohsenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmadi, Mehrnooshen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanaraki, Anahita Khorramien_US
dc.contributor.authorKhatibi, Alien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T10:39:36Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T10:39:36Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.departmentInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (NEUROSCIENCE)en_US
dc.departmentNanotechnology Research Center (NANOTAM)en_US
dc.departmentAysel Sabuncu Brain Research Center (BAM)en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: According to the pain research literature, attentional bias for pain is the mechanism responsible for the development and maintenance of fear of pain in patients with chronic pain. However, there is still some debate about the exact mechanism and the role of faster engagement versus difficulty in disengagement in the development of attentional bias. Methods: To investigate attentional bias in patients with chronic pain, we used an eye-tracker with the pictures of pain-provoking activities and compared the results with an age- and gendermatched group of pain-free participants. In addition, other measures of pain-related cognition and pain severity ratings were included to assess their contribution to the attentional bias toward pain-related information. Results: Calculating the frequency of the first fixations showed that both groups fixated initially on pain-provoking pictures compared to neutral one. Calculating the speed of fixations showed that control participants were faster in fixating on neutral stimuli, but patients with pain were faster in fixating on pain-provoking pictures, indicating a relative vigilance for the pain-related stimuli among them. These patients reported that the intensity of pain in the previous week was positively correlated with the speed of their fixation on the painful stimuli. Conclusion: Although these results did not provide unequivocal support for the vigilanceavoidance hypothesis, they are generally consistent with the results of studies using eye tracking technology. Furthermore, our findings put a question over characterization of attentional biases in patients with chronic pain by simply relating that to difficulty in disengaging from pain-related stimuli.en_US
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2018-04-12T10:39:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 179475 bytes, checksum: ea0bedeb05ac9ccfb983c327e155f0c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017en
dc.identifier.doi10.29252/nirp.bcn.8.6.467en_US
dc.identifier.issn2008-126X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/36427
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherIran University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.29252/nirp.bcn.8.6.467en_US
dc.source.titleBasic and Clinical Neuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectAttentional biasen_US
dc.subjectChronic painen_US
dc.subjectEye movementen_US
dc.subjectPHODAen_US
dc.titleChronic pain and selective attention to pain arousing daily activity pictures : evidence from an eye tracking studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Chronic pain and selective attention to pain arousing daily activity pictures Evidence from an eye tracking study.pdf
Size:
788.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version