Immigrant associations in Canada: included, accommodated, or excluded?

dc.citation.epage215en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber2en_US
dc.citation.spage195en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber10en_US
dc.contributor.authorOzcurumez, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T10:04:04Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T10:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Political Science and Public Administrationen_US
dc.description.abstractConcurring with the view that political opportunity structures and citizenship regimes affect participatory patterns of immigrants through shaping associational activity and mobilization of immigrant groups, this essay examines the evidence from the case of Turkish immigrant associations in Canada to delineate and analyze variables other than institutional context and citizenship regimes that constrain collective participation. It focuses on the impact of history of immigration by Turks to Canada (Montreal and Toronto), trajectory and scope of associational activity, group size and heterogeneity, and political participation. It concludes that collective mobilization and participation by immigrant groups are constrained by intra-group characteristics alongside the institutional context of the receiving country.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14683840902864002en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9663
dc.identifier.issn1468-3849
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/22731
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683840902864002en_US
dc.source.titleTurkish Studiesen_US
dc.titleImmigrant associations in Canada: included, accommodated, or excluded?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Immigrant associations in Canada Included, accommodated, or excluded.pdf
Size:
298.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version