A Performance comparision of polar codes with convolutional turbo codes

buir.advisorArıkan, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorÖzgür, Üstün
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-08T18:10:49Z
dc.date.available2016-01-08T18:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.descriptionAnkara : Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering and the Institute of Engineering and Sciences of Bilkent University, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's) -- Bilkent University, 2009.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references leaves 134-136.en_US
dc.description.abstractPolar codes introduced recently by Arıkan are the first low-complexity codes achieving symmetric capacity for arbitrary binary-input discrete memoryless channels (B-DMCs). Although being theoretically significant, their practical significance is an issue that has not yet been fully explored. Previous studies have compared polar codes with Reed-Muller codes, where it was found that polar codes can outperform them. In this thesis, to investigate how polar codes perform against state-of-the-art forward error correction (FEC) codes used in practice, we implement a IEEE 802.16 based link-level Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) simulator which incorporates several WiMAX FEC options, and polar codes. IEEE 802.16 standards family define standards for current and next generation broadband wireless access, which will make high data rate multimedia applications in mobile environments a reality. Next generation broadband access standard, pursued by the IEEE 802.16 Task Group m is a work in progress, and requires even more sophisticated error correction schemes so that higher throughput, better QOS, higher mobilities, wider ranges and lower latencies are supported. We perform performance comparison simulations with the convolutional turbo codes (CTC) configurations defined in IEEE 802.16e to see how much of a performance gap exists between polar codes and CTCs. The main findings of the thesis are that, although the polar codes achieve capacity for specific conditions, as expected, for the code lengths and channel conditions we have simulated, the performance of them cannot compete with that of the CTCs with equivalent rates and lengths. It remains a task to see whether polar codes can achieve similar performances with CTCs when used as component codes in other configurations and aid in the advancement of new communication technologies.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.S.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityÖzgür, Üstünen_US
dc.format.extentxxx, 136 leavesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/14911
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBilkent Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectWirelessMANen_US
dc.subjectPerformance Comparisonen_US
dc.subjectReed-Muller Codesen_US
dc.subjectMIMOen_US
dc.subjectWirelessMAN-OFDMA Simulatoren_US
dc.subjectWiMAXen_US
dc.subjectconvolutional turbo codesen_US
dc.subjectpolar codesen_US
dc.subjectphysical layer technologiesen_US
dc.subjectIEEE 802.16men_US
dc.subjectIEEE 802.16een_US
dc.subjectWirelessMAN-OFDMAen_US
dc.subject.lccQC441 .O94 2009en_US
dc.subject.lcshPolarization.en_US
dc.subject.lcshWireless communication systems.en_US
dc.titleA Performance comparision of polar codes with convolutional turbo codesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
0003872.pdf
Size:
2.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format