Urbanization and urbanism
Date
Authors
Editor(s)
Advisor
Supervisor
Co-Advisor
Co-Supervisor
Instructor
Source Title
Print ISSN
Electronic ISSN
Publisher
Volume
Issue
Pages
Language
Type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Usage Stats
views
downloads
Series
Abstract
Turkey’s urbanization started in the post-World War II era. “Over 3.3 million people were added to the urban population during the 1950s, more than twice as many as in the previous quarter century” (Danielson and Keles¸, 1985: 27). This “rapid urbanization” brought major transformations of society, challenging the ideals of the modernization project of the Republican elite; it introduced new problems and challenges prevail today, albeit changed in their nature. These challenges affected various aspects of society, ranging from housing to job markets, from cultural hierarchies to politics, and from rule of law and private property to land rent. “Unregulated and unauthorized housing and job markets” and “unplanned urbanization,” along with “populist politics,” “rurality in the urban,” and “invasion of land” came to be the elements of the discursive production of urbanization in the Turkish context. Accordingly, the “integration”/“assimilation” of rural migrants into urban society, their “illegal” (yet sometimes legitimate) gecekondus, the rent appropriation from gecekondu land, the bargaining power of gecekondu residents with politicians, and their arabesk culture came to be the main problems identified in the Turkish urbanization process, reflecting the top-down approach of the urban elite. In the rest of the chapter, the defining characteristics of urbanization in Turkey are first described briefly. Then, the urbanization experience of Turkey is introduced, divided into two periods: 1950-80, during which the national developmentalist model prevailed; and the 1980s up to today, during which time neoliberal policies have been introduced, restructuring the society and transforming its cities. Finally, “urbanism” and “urbanity” are discussed in the Turkish context, in an attempt to unravel their contested meanings.