To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?

Date
2009
Authors
Durrant, P.
Schmitt, N.
Advisor
Supervisor
Co-Advisor
Co-Supervisor
Instructor
Source Title
IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Print ISSN
0019-042X
Electronic ISSN
Publisher
De Gruyter Mouton
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
157 - 177
Language
English
Type
Article
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Series
Abstract

Usage-based models claim that first language learning is based on the frequency-based analysis of memorised phrases. It is not clear though, whether adult second language learning works in the same way. It has been claimed that non-native language lacks idiomatic formulas, suggesting that learners neglect phrases, focusing instead on orthographic words. While a number of studies challenge the claim that non-native language lacks formulaicity, these studies have two important shortcomings: they fail to take account of appropriate frequency information and they pool the writing of different learners in ways that may mask individual differences. Using methodologies which avoid these problems, this study found that non-native writers rely heavily on high-frequency collocations, but that they underuse less frequent, strongly associated collocations (items which are probably highly salient for native speakers). These findings are consistent with usage-based models of acquisition while accounting for the impression that non-native writing lacks idiomatic phraseology.

Course
Other identifiers
Book Title
Keywords
Citation
Published Version (Please cite this version)