Working memory related to different subtasks can be maintained in separate, non-interfering stores

buir.advisorFarooqui, Ausaf Ahmed
buir.supervisor
dc.contributor.authorRezaei, Aida
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T13:23:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T13:23:04Z
dc.date.copyright2024-07
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.date.submitted2024-08-12
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of article.
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's): Bilkent University, Department of Neuroscience, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, 2024.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 74-79).
dc.description.abstractHow can WM maintain more information when its capacity is only around 4 items? Here, we explore the possibility that information related to separate subtasks do not count towards this limit, perhaps, because they are maintained in non-interfering stores. Across the two experiments, we investigated if increasing the WM load related to one subtask interfered with the execution of a concurrent but distinct second subtask. In Experiment 1, participants first saw pictures that were to be kept in mind and used for a later subtask B. They then executed subtask A, while keeping in mind these subtask B pictures. Although subtasks A and B involved maintaining and updating identical sets of pictures, increasing the number of subtask B pictures did not interfere with subtask A execution, which was only affected when the number of pictures relevant to it was increased, suggesting that subtask A and B pictures were maintained in separate non-interfering stores. An objection might be that in Experiment 1, subtask B pictures were passively and not goal-directedly maintained. In Experiment 2, participants executed a more complex subtask that forced participants to maintain and update two separate sets of subtask B pictures while executing subtask A and subtask A also involved WM maintenance and updating of identical pictures. We found that even here increased load of subtask B pictures did not affect subtask A performance. Thus, at least in some multitasking situations, information related to distinct subtasks can be maintained in separate non-interfering stores.
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Betül Özen (ozen@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2024-08-19T13:23:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 B162590.pdf: 2504650 bytes, checksum: 005fbd89826ed9e85f1108d06ef81b67 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-19T13:23:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 B162590.pdf: 2504650 bytes, checksum: 005fbd89826ed9e85f1108d06ef81b67 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024-07en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Aida Rezaei
dc.format.extentxiii, 79 leaves : color illustrations, 30 cm.
dc.identifier.itemidB162590
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/115754
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectWorking memory
dc.subjectWorking memory capacity
dc.subjectMultitasking
dc.subjectSubtask independence
dc.subjectTask interference
dc.titleWorking memory related to different subtasks can be maintained in separate, non-interfering stores
dc.title.alternativeFarklı alt go revlerle ilişkili çalışma belleg i ayrı, mu dahale etmeyen depolarda korunabilir
dc.typeThesis
thesis.degree.disciplineNeuroscience
thesis.degree.grantorBilkent University
thesis.degree.levelMaster's
thesis.degree.nameMS (Master of Science)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
B162590.pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.1 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: