Cognitive frames of track two practitioners: how do they affect (best) practice?

Simple item page
buir.contributor.authorÇuhadar, Esra
dc.citation.epage102en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber1en_US
dc.citation.spage124en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber26en_US
dc.contributor.authorÇuhadar, Esra
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T09:27:27Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T09:27:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDepartment of Political Science and Public Administrationen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the extent to which framing affects Track Two diplomacy practice and especially how the cognitive frames used by practitioners shape the design of their interventions. The framing effect is pervasive and shapes every type of action. Peacebuilding and Track Two work are no exception. Track Two practitioners often rely on frames as cognitive heuristics when they design their interventions. This article reports on the results of an online survey of 273 participants, using measures based on categories identified in two previous qualitative studies using the grounded theory approach. Four main frames used by practitioners are presented, along with examples from practice: psychologists, constructivists, capacity-builders, and realistic negotiators. Finally, the implications of being captive to the framing effect for Track Two practice are discussed. Steps are suggested towards making more deliberative and reflective context-specific decisions about interventions rather than “fast thinking” based on heuristics and bias.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Onur Emek (onur.emek@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2021-02-11T09:27:27Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Cognitive_Frames_of_Track_Two_Practitioners_How_Do_They_Affect_(Best)_Practice.pdf: 557818 bytes, checksum: d69cf3fa36ec0aa60d35db2759eca121 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-02-11T09:27:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cognitive_Frames_of_Track_Two_Practitioners_How_Do_They_Affect_(Best)_Practice.pdf: 557818 bytes, checksum: d69cf3fa36ec0aa60d35db2759eca121 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020en
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15718069-BJA10027en_US
dc.identifier.issn1382-340X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/55073
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherBrillen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718069-BJA10027en_US
dc.source.titleInternational Negotiationen_US
dc.subjectTrack two negotiationsen_US
dc.subjectPeacebuildingen_US
dc.subjectPractitionersen_US
dc.subjectCognitive framesen_US
dc.titleCognitive frames of track two practitioners: how do they affect (best) practice?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cognitive_Frames_of_Track_Two_Practitioners_How_Do_They_Affect_(Best)_Practice.pdf
Size:
544.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Scholarly Publications - Political Science and Public Administration