An interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building design

buir.contributor.authorAfacan, Yasemin
dc.citation.epage744en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber4en_US
dc.citation.spage731en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber40en_US
dc.contributor.authorAfacan, Yaseminen_US
dc.contributor.authorErbug, C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-28T11:58:12Z
dc.date.available2015-07-28T11:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Designen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study highlights how heuristic evaluation as a usability evaluation method can feed into Current building design practice to conform to universal design principles. It provides a definition of universal usability that is applicable to an architectural design context. It takes the seven universal design principles as a set of heuristics and applies an iterative sequence of heuristic evaluation in a shopping mall, aiming to achieve a cost-effective evaluation process. The evaluation was composed of three consecutive sessions. First, five evaluators from different professions were interviewed regarding the construction drawings in terms of universal design principles. Then, each evaluator was asked to perform the predefined task scenarios. In subsequent interviews, the evaluators were asked to reanalyze the construction drawings. The results showed that heuristic evaluation could successfully integrate universal usability into Current building design practice in two ways: (i) it promoted an iterative evaluation process combined with multi-sessions rather than relying on one evaluator and on one evaluation session to find the maximum number of usability problems, and (ii) it highlighted the necessity of an interdisciplinary ad hoc committee regarding the heuristic abilities of each profession. A multi-session and interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method can save both the project budget and the required time, while ensuring a reduced error rate for the universal usage of the built environments. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2015-07-28T11:58:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 10.1016-j.apergo.2008.07.002.pdf: 3408224 bytes, checksum: 1e7ccf5ac5b2089090fd5c513d7381f4 (MD5)en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.002en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9126
dc.identifier.issn0003-6870
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/11628
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.002en_US
dc.source.titleApplied Ergonomicsen_US
dc.subjectHeuristic Evaluation Methoden_US
dc.subjectUniversal Designen_US
dc.subjectUniversal Usabilityen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectBuilding Designen_US
dc.subjectUsabilityen_US
dc.subjectRequirementsen_US
dc.subjectUsersen_US
dc.subjectAccessibilityen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectFrameworken_US
dc.subjectProductsen_US
dc.subjectModelen_US
dc.titleAn interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method for universal building designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1016-j.apergo.2008.07.002.pdf
Size:
3.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format