Feature point classification and matching
buir.advisor | Onural, Levent | |
dc.contributor.author | Ay, Avşar Polat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-08T18:03:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-08T18:03:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.description | Cataloged from PDF version of article. | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references leaves 85-105. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A feature point is a salient point which can be separated from its neighborhood. Widely used definitions assume that feature points are corners. However, some non-feature points also satisfy this assumption. Hence, non-feature points, which are highly undesired, are usually detected as feature points. Texture properties around detected points can be used to eliminate non-feature points by determining the distinctiveness of the detected points within their neighborhoods. There are many texture description methods, such as autoregressive models, Gibbs/Markov random field models, time-frequency transforms, etc. To increase the performance of feature point related applications, two new feature point descriptors are proposed, and used in non-feature point elimination and feature point sorting-matching. To have a computationally feasible descriptor algorithm, a single image resolution scale is selected for analyzing the texture properties around the detected points. To create a scale-space, wavelet decomposition is applied to the given images and neighborhood scale-spaces are formed for every detected point. The analysis scale of a point is selected according to the changes in the kurtosis values of histograms which are extracted from the neighborhood scale-space. By using descriptors, the detected non-feature points are eliminated, feature points are sorted and with inclusion of conventional descriptors feature points are matched. According to the scores obtained in the experiments, the proposed detection-matching scheme performs more reliable than the Harris detector gray-level patch matching scheme. However, SIFT detection-matching scheme performs better than the proposed scheme. | en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Ay, Avşar Polat | en_US |
dc.format.extent | xxvii, 186 leaves, graphs | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/14610 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Feature Point Elimination | en_US |
dc.subject | Feature Points | en_US |
dc.subject | Feature Point Detection | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital Video Processing | en_US |
dc.subject | Feature Point Matching | en_US |
dc.subject.lcc | QA274.42 .A9 2007 | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Point processes. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Matching theory. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Algorithms. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Image processing--Digital techniques. | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Stochastic processes. | en_US |
dc.title | Feature point classification and matching | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Electrical and Electronic Engineering | |
thesis.degree.grantor | Bilkent University | |
thesis.degree.level | Master's | |
thesis.degree.name | MS (Master of Science) |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1