Investing in quality under autonomous and induced learning
dc.citation.epage | 555 | en_US |
dc.citation.issueNumber | 6 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 545 | en_US |
dc.citation.volumeNumber | 35 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Serel, D. A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dada, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Moskowitz, H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Plante, R. D. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T10:29:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T10:29:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Management | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The reduction of variability in product performance characteristics is an important focus of quality improvement programs. Learning is intrinsically linked to process improvement and can assume two forms: (i) autonomous learning; and (ii) induced learning. The former is experientially-based, while the latter is a result of deliberate managerial action. Our involvement in quality and capacity planning with several major corporations in different industries suggested that it would be instructive to devise a model that would prescribe an optimal combination of autonomous and induced learning over time to maximize process improvement. We thus propose such a model to investigate the optimal quality improvement path for a company given that quality costs depend on both autonomous and induced types of learning experienced on a number of quality characteristics. Several properties of an optimal investment path are developed for this problem. For example, it is shown that decisions maximizing short-term gains may actually lead to suboptimal resource utilization decisions when total costs associated with a longer planning horizon are taken into account. Numerical examples are used to assess the sensitivity of the optimal investment plan with respect to changes in several model parameters. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T10:29:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2003 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/07408170304415 | en_US |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1545-8830 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0740-817X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/24467 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07408170304415 | en_US |
dc.source.title | IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers) | en_US |
dc.subject | Costs | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Investments | en_US |
dc.subject | Learning systems | en_US |
dc.subject | Process engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Resource allocation | en_US |
dc.subject | Product performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Quality control | en_US |
dc.title | Investing in quality under autonomous and induced learning | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Investing in quality under autonomous and induced learning.pdf
- Size:
- 316.4 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version