The aesthetic experience of interior spaces with curvilinear boundaries and various space properties in immersive and desktop-based virtual environments

buir.contributor.authorElver Boz, Tuğce
buir.contributor.authorDemirkan, Halime
buir.contributor.authorÜrgen, Burcu Ayşen
buir.contributor.orcidDemirkan, Halime|0000-0002-2055-3089
buir.contributor.orcidÜrgen, Burcu Ayşen|0000-0001-9664-0309
buir.contributor.orcidElver Boz, Tuğce|0000-0001-6614-2288
dc.citation.epage11
dc.citation.spage1
dc.contributor.authorElver Boz, Tuğce
dc.contributor.authorDemirkan, Halime
dc.contributor.authorÜrgen, Burcu Ayşen
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-24T08:34:23Z
dc.date.available2025-02-24T08:34:23Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-05
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design
dc.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.departmentInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (NEUROSCIENCE)
dc.departmentNational Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM)
dc.departmentAysel Sabuncu Brain Research Center (BAM)
dc.description.abstractThe study aims to investigate participants' aesthetic experience in response to environments with curvilinear boundaries that are presented in two different virtual environments (VEs), namely immersive (IVE) and desktop-based virtual environments (DTVE). To this end, 60 participants were presented with 360 degrees 32 VE visualizations that had either horizontal or vertical curvilinear boundaries and possessed various architectural properties (size/light/texture/color) using a head-mounted display and a desktop computer. The aesthetic experience in response to these visualizations was measured in terms of the three key dimensions identified in a previous study (Elver Boz et al., 2022): familiarity, excitement, and fascination. In addition, participants' sense of presence in the two different environments was measured. The results show that familiarity and excitement dimensions were significantly higher in IVE than in DTVE, whereas the two environments did not significantly differ from each other in terms of the fascination dimension. As for the boundary types, the familiarity dimension was significantly higher in horizontal curvilinear boundaries than in vertical ones. In contrast, excitement and fascination dimensions were significantly higher in vertical curvilinear boundaries than in horizontal ones. The only dimension that showed an interaction between boundary types and the type of VE was excitement. Finally, IVE induced a higher presence feeling than DTVE. Overall, results suggest that people's aesthetic experiences toward built environments change as a function of the boundary types and the medium they are presented with these environments and that different dimensions of the aesthetic experience are affected differently by these variables.
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/aca0000723
dc.identifier.eissn1931-390X
dc.identifier.issn1931-3896
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11693/116731
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000723
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 US DEED (Attribution 3.0 United States)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/deed.en
dc.source.titlePsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
dc.subjectArchitectural variables
dc.subjectAesthetic experience
dc.subjectVirtual reality
dc.subjectImmersive virtual environment
dc.subjectDesktop-based virtual environments
dc.titleThe aesthetic experience of interior spaces with curvilinear boundaries and various space properties in immersive and desktop-based virtual environments
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The_Aesthetic_Experience_of_Interior_Spaces_With_Curvilinear_Boundaries_and_Various_Space_Properties_in_Immersive_and_Desktop-Based_Virtual_Environments.pdf
Size:
3.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: