Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not a major modulating factor in the cytotoxic response to natural products in cancer cell lines

buir.contributor.authorKüçükkaraduman, Barş
buir.contributor.authorÇiçek, Ekin Gökçe
buir.contributor.authorAkbar, Muhammad Waqas
buir.contributor.orcidKüçükkaraduman, Barş|0000-0002-5475-281X
buir.contributor.orcidAkbar, Muhammad Waqas|0000-0003-4458-2236
dc.citation.epage15en_US
dc.citation.issueNumber19en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber26en_US
dc.contributor.authorKüçükkaraduman, Barş
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Ekin Gökçe
dc.contributor.authorAkbar, Muhammad Waqas
dc.contributor.authorDemirkol Canlı, Seçil
dc.contributor.authorVural, Burçak
dc.contributor.authorGure, Ali Osmay
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-18T11:54:50Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18T11:54:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-27
dc.departmentDepartment of Molecular Biology and Geneticsen_US
dc.description.abstractNumerous natural products exhibit antiproliferative activity against cancer cells by modulating various biological pathways. In this study, we investigated the potential use of eight natural compounds (apigenin, curcumin, epigallocatechin gallate, fisetin, forskolin, procyanidin B2, resveratrol, urolithin A) and two repurposed agents (fulvestrant and metformin) as chemotherapy enhancers and mesenchymal-to-epithelial (MET) inducers of cancer cells. Screening of these compounds in various colon, breast, and pancreatic cancer cell lines revealed anti-cancer activity for all compounds, with curcumin being the most effective among these in all cell lines. Although some of the natural products were able to induce MET in some cancer cell lines, the MET induction was not related to increased synergy with either 5-FU, irinotecan, gemcitabine, or gefitinib. When synergy was observed, for example with curcumin and irinotecan, this was unrelated to MET induction, as assessed by changes in E-cadherin and vimentin expression. Our results show that MET induction is compound and cell line specific, and that MET is not necessarily related to enhanced chemosensitivity.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Türkan Cesur (cturkan@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2022-02-18T11:54:50Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal_Transition_Is_Not_a_Major_Modulating_Factor_in_the_Cytotoxic_Response_to_Natural_Products_in_Cancer_Cell_Lines.pdf: 3250371 bytes, checksum: c46cab30f8410d9ffc6d3e63a8d163c3 (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2022-02-18T11:54:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal_Transition_Is_Not_a_Major_Modulating_Factor_in_the_Cytotoxic_Response_to_Natural_Products_in_Cancer_Cell_Lines.pdf: 3250371 bytes, checksum: c46cab30f8410d9ffc6d3e63a8d163c3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-09-27en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/molecules26195858en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1420-3049
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/77513
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195858en_US
dc.source.titleMoleculesen_US
dc.subjectNatural productsen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectChemotherapy resistanceen_US
dc.subjectEpithelial-to-mesenchymal transitionen_US
dc.subjectMesenchymal-to-epithelial transitionen_US
dc.titleEpithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not a major modulating factor in the cytotoxic response to natural products in cancer cell linesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal_Transition_Is_Not_a_Major_Modulating_Factor_in_the_Cytotoxic_Response_to_Natural_Products_in_Cancer_Cell_Lines.pdf
Size:
3.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: