Differential privacy with bounded priors: Reconciling utility and privacy in genome-wide association studies
dc.citation.epage | 1297 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 1286 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tramèr, F. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Z. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hubaux J.-P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ayday, Erman | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Denver, Colorado, USA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T12:16:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T12:16:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10 | en_US |
dc.department | Department of Computer Engineering | en_US |
dc.description | Conference name: CCS '15 Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security | |
dc.description | Date of Conference: 12 - 16 October, 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | Differential privacy (DP) has become widely accepted as a rigorous definition of data privacy, with stronger privacy guarantees than traditional statistical methods. However, recent studies have shown that for reasonable privacy budgets, differential privacy significantly affects the expected utility. Many alternative privacy notions which aim at relaxing DP have since been proposed, with the hope of providing a better tradeoff between privacy and utility. At CCS'13, Li et al. introduced the membership privacy framework, wherein they aim at protecting against set membership disclosure by adversaries whose prior knowledge is captured by a family of probability distributions. In the context of this framework, we investigate a relaxation of DP, by considering prior distributions that capture more reasonable amounts of background knowledge. We show that for different privacy budgets, DP can be used to achieve membership privacy for various adversarial settings, thus leading to an interesting tradeoff between privacy guarantees and utility. We re-evaluate methods for releasing differentially private χ2-statistics in genome-wide association studies and show that we can achieve a higher utility than in previous works, while still guaranteeing membership privacy in a relevant adversarial setting. © 2015 ACM. | en_US |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T12:16:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/2810103.2813610 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11693/28296 | |
dc.language.iso | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | ACM | |
dc.relation.isversionof | http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2810103.2813610 | en_US |
dc.source.title | Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security | en_US |
dc.subject | Data-driven medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Differential privacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Genomic privacy | en_US |
dc.subject | GWAS | en_US |
dc.subject | Membership privacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Budget control | en_US |
dc.subject | Genes | en_US |
dc.subject | Knowledge management | en_US |
dc.subject | Probability distributions | en_US |
dc.subject | Back-ground knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Data driven | en_US |
dc.subject | Differential privacies | en_US |
dc.subject | Expected utility | en_US |
dc.subject | Genome-wide association studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Prior distribution | en_US |
dc.subject | Privacy frameworks | en_US |
dc.subject | Data privacy | en_US |
dc.title | Differential privacy with bounded priors: Reconciling utility and privacy in genome-wide association studies | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Differential privacy with bounded priors Reconciling utility and privacy in genome-wide association studies.pdf
- Size:
- 793.41 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full printable version