Towards the adoption of most suitable green walls within sustainable buildings using interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and TOPSIS technique

buir.contributor.authorAshour, Mojtaba
buir.contributor.orcidAshour, Mojtaba|0000-0002-6076-8375
dc.contributor.authorTabatabaee, S.
dc.contributor.authorAshour, Mojtaba
dc.contributor.authorSadeghi, H.
dc.contributor.authorHoseini, S. A.
dc.contributor.authorMohandes, S. R.
dc.contributor.authorMahdiyar, A.
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, S.
dc.contributor.authorHosseini, M. R.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T13:47:25Z
dc.date.available2023-02-27T13:47:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-08
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Designen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose – To come up with a prudent decision on the installation of an appropriate green wall (GW) on buildings, this study presents a novel decision-making algorithm. The proposed algorithm considers the importance of barriers hampering GW adoption, as well as their relationships with regard to different types of GWs existing in a contextual setting. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed methodological approach is based on the integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques by employing focus group discussion, fuzzy-based best-worst method and fuzzy TOPSIS. Findings – Based on the experiences of qualified experts involved in related projects in Hong Kong, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) cost, installation and maintenance-related barriers are perceived to have the highest importance, (2) modular living wall system is the most suitable GW system for the context of Hong Kong and (3) existing barriers are found to have a pivotal role in the ranking of the most suitable GW systems. Practical implications – The findings provide valuable insight not only for policymakers and stakeholders, but also for establishing a methodological approach that can assist decision-makers in identifying the most beneficial GW system rather than the most applicable one. This could have significant implications and introduce potential changes to the common way of practice within the industry and lay the foundation for wider adoption of GW. Originality/value – While previous studies have investigated the sustainability-related issues of GW façade applications, the current body of knowledge is deprived of a comprehensive methodological approach for the selection of the most suitable GW systems.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Ayça Nur Sezen (ayca.sezen@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2023-02-27T13:47:25Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Towards_the_adoption_of_most_suitable_green_walls_within_sustainable_buildings_using_interval_type-2_fuzzy_best-worst_method_and_TOPSIS_technique.pdf: 573875 bytes, checksum: 5152cf22d010c2a83779c724d92a4f9f (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-02-27T13:47:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Towards_the_adoption_of_most_suitable_green_walls_within_sustainable_buildings_using_interval_type-2_fuzzy_best-worst_method_and_TOPSIS_technique.pdf: 573875 bytes, checksum: 5152cf22d010c2a83779c724d92a4f9f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-11-08en
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/ECAM-06-2022-0551en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1365-232X
dc.identifier.issn0969-9988
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/111835
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2022-0551en_US
dc.source.titleEngineering, Construction and Architectural Managementen_US
dc.subjectGreen wallsen_US
dc.subjectGreen constructionen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy sets theoryen_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision-making methodsen_US
dc.titleTowards the adoption of most suitable green walls within sustainable buildings using interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and TOPSIS techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Towards_the_adoption_of_most_suitable_green_walls_within_sustainable_buildings_using_interval_type-2_fuzzy_best-worst_method_and_TOPSIS_technique.pdf
Size:
560.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: