Influence of phase function on modeled optical response of nanoparticle-labeled epithelial tissues

dc.citation.issueNumber8en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber16en_US
dc.contributor.authorCihan, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArifler, D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T09:51:50Z
dc.date.available2016-02-08T09:51:50Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineeringen_US
dc.description.abstractMetal nanoparticles can be functionalized with biomolecules to selectively localize in precancerous tissues and can act as optical contrast enhancers for reflectance-based diagnosis of epithelial precancer. We carry out Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to analyze photon propagation through nanoparticle-labeled tissues and to reveal the importance of using a proper form of phase function for modeling purposes. We first employ modified phase functions generated with a weighting scheme that accounts for the relative scattering strengths of unlabeled tissue and nanoparticles. To present a comparative analysis, we repeat ourMCsimulations with simplified functions that only approximate the angular scattering properties of labeled tissues. The results obtained for common optical sensor geometries and biologically relevant labeling schemes indicate that the exact form of the phase function used as model input plays an important role in determining the reflectance response and approximating functions often prove inadequate in predicting the extent of contrast enhancement due to labeling. Detected reflectance intensities computed with different phase functions can differ up to ̃60% and such a significant deviation may even alter the perceived contrast profile. These results need to be taken into account when developing photon propagation models to assess the diagnostic potential of nanoparticle-enhanced optical measurements. © 2011 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).en_US
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-02-08T09:51:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 70227 bytes, checksum: 26e812c6f5156f83f0e77b261a471b5a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011en
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/1.3608999en_US
dc.identifier.issn10833668
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/21841
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3608999en_US
dc.source.titleJournal of Biomedical Opticsen_US
dc.subjectEpithelial precanceren_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo modelingen_US
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectOptical sensorsen_US
dc.subjectPhase functionen_US
dc.subjectReflectanceen_US
dc.subjectAngular scatteringen_US
dc.subjectComparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectContrast Enhancementen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic potentialen_US
dc.subjectEpithelial precanceren_US
dc.subjectEpithelial tissueen_US
dc.subjectFunctionalizeden_US
dc.subjectLabeling schemeen_US
dc.subjectMetal nanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectModel inputsen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo modelingen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo simulationsen_US
dc.subjectOptical contrasten_US
dc.subjectOptical measurementen_US
dc.subjectOptical responseen_US
dc.subjectPerceived contrasten_US
dc.subjectPhase functionsen_US
dc.subjectPhoton propagationen_US
dc.subjectPhoton propagation modelen_US
dc.subjectRelative scatteringen_US
dc.subjectSensor geometriesen_US
dc.subjectSimplified functionsen_US
dc.subjectWeighting schemeen_US
dc.subjectHistologyen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo methodsen_US
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectOptical data processingen_US
dc.subjectOptical sensorsen_US
dc.subjectPhotonsen_US
dc.subjectReflectionen_US
dc.subjectTissueen_US
dc.subjectgolden_US
dc.subjectmetal nanoparticleen_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectbiological modelen_US
dc.subjectchemistryen_US
dc.subjectcomputer simulationen_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectepitheliumen_US
dc.subjectlighten_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo methoden_US
dc.subjectparticle sizeen_US
dc.subjectphotonen_US
dc.subjectprecanceren_US
dc.subjectradiation scatteringen_US
dc.subjectComputer Simulationen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic Imagingen_US
dc.subjectEpitheliumen_US
dc.subjectGolden_US
dc.subjectLighten_US
dc.subjectMetal Nanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectModels, Biologicalen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo Methoden_US
dc.subjectParticle Sizeen_US
dc.subjectPhotonsen_US
dc.subjectPrecancerous Conditionsen_US
dc.subjectScattering, Radiationen_US
dc.titleInfluence of phase function on modeled optical response of nanoparticle-labeled epithelial tissuesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Influence of phase function on modeled optical response of nanoparticle-labeled epithelial tissues.pdf
Size:
570.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full printable version