Impact of building massing on energy efficient school buildings

buir.contributor.authorAfacan, Yasemin
buir.contributor.authorRanjbar, Ali
dc.citation.epage22en_US
dc.citation.spage11en_US
dc.citation.volumeNumber163en_US
dc.contributor.authorAfacan, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorRanjbar, Ali
dc.contributor.editorLittlewood, J.
dc.contributor.editorHowlett, R. J.
dc.contributor.editorCapozzoli, A.
dc.contributor.editorJain, L. C.
dc.coverage.spatialBudapest, Hungaryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T13:14:48Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T13:14:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentDepartment of Interior Architecture and Environmental Designen_US
dc.descriptionDate of Conference: 4-5 July 2019en_US
dc.descriptionConference Name: 11th International Conference on Sustainability and Energy in Buildings, SEB 2019en_US
dc.description.abstractTo produce energy-efficient buildings, optimization process for all design stages is necessary. Optimization starts with the massing of the building. This study investigates the impact of the five school massing typologies on energy efficiency: (i) spine/street; (ii) city/town; (iii) atrium; (iv) strawberry/cluster; and (v) courtyard. The chosen massing typologies respond to the question of what an optimum spatial organization of massing is to (i) maximize the use of renewable resources; (ii) utilize thermal inertia of buildings; and (iii) consider the relationship between inside and outside, both existing and future. For each massing type, Sefaira program was used, and simulations were run for annual energy use, annual energy cost and annual carbon dioxide (CO2)(CO2) emissions. The energy use indices (EUI) of the alternatives are around 86 kWh/m2/yr. In the spine massing, the EUI value is much higher than the other four buildings. The highest annual net CO2CO2 emissions are obtained in atrium type of building, which has more floors compared to other massing type. The courtyard type has the most efficient annual electricity cost per area. These findings showed that the goal of the building massing should be not only limited to achieve the low EUI. Thus, this study suggests that an energy-efficient massing should address the questions beyond well-known ASHRAE standards, and define a new holistic model that considers the ratio of surface area to volume more for reducing energy loads than a typical high-performance schools.en_US
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Zeynep Aykut (zeynepay@bilkent.edu.tr) on 2021-03-04T13:14:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 268963 bytes, checksum: ad2e3a30c8172b573b9662390ed2d3cf (MD5)en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-03-04T13:14:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bilkent-research-paper.pdf: 268963 bytes, checksum: ad2e3a30c8172b573b9662390ed2d3cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_2en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789813298675
dc.identifier.issn2190-3018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11693/75783
dc.language.isoEnglishen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9868-2_2en_US
dc.source.titleSmart Innovation, Systems and Technologiesen_US
dc.subjectMassingen_US
dc.subjectSchoolen_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectSefairaen_US
dc.titleImpact of building massing on energy efficient school buildingsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Impact_of_building_massing_on_energy_efficient_school_buildings.pdf
Size:
790.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: