Browsing by Subject "magnetometer"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Open Access
A comparative study on human activity classification with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors
(2011) Yüksek, Murat Cihan
This study provides a comparative assessment on the different techniques of classifying human activities that are performed using body-worn miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. The classification techniques compared in this study are: naive Bayesian (NB) classifier, artificial neural networks (ANNs), dissimilarity-based classifier (DBC), various decision-tree methods, Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and support vector machines (SVM). The algorithms for these techniques are provided on two commonly used open source environments: Waikato environment for knowledge analysis (WEKA), a Java-based software; and pattern recognition toolbox (PRTools), a MATLAB toolbox. Human activities are classified using five sensor units worn on the chest, the arms, and the legs. Each sensor unit comprises a tri-axial gyroscope, a tri-axial accelerometer, and a tri-axial magnetometer. A feature set extracted from the raw sensor data using principal component analysis (PCA) is used in the classification process. Three different cross-validation techniques are employed to validate the classifiers. A performance comparison of the classification techniques is provided in terms of their correct differentiation rates, confusion matrices, and computational cost. The methods that result in the highest correct differentiation rates are found to be ANN (99.2%), SVM (99.2%), and GMM (99.1%). The magnetometer is the best type of sensor to be used in classification whereas gyroscope is the least useful. Considering the locations of the sensor units on body, the sensors worn on the legs seem to provide the most valuable information.
Open Access
Human activity classification with miniature inertial sensors
(2009) Tunçel, Orkun
This thesis provides a comparative study on activity recognition using miniature inertial sensors (gyroscopes and accelerometers) and magnetometers worn on the human body. The classification methods used and compared in this study are: a rule-based algorithm (RBA) or decision tree, least-squares method (LSM), k-nearest neighbor algorithm (k-NN), dynamic time warping (DTW- 1 and DTW-2), and support vector machines (SVM). In the first part of this study, eight different leg motions are classified using only two single-axis gyroscopes. In the second part, human activities are classified using five sensor units worn on different parts of the body. Each sensor unit comprises a tri-axial gyroscope, a tri-axial accelerometer and a tri-axial magnetometer. Different feature sets extracted from the raw sensor data and these are used in the classification process. A number of feature extraction and reduction techniques (principal component analysis) as well as different cross-validation techniques have been implemented and compared. A performance comparison of these classification methods is provided in terms of their correct differentiation rates, confusion matrices, pre-processing and training times and classification times. Among the classification techniques we have considered and implemented, SVM, in general, gives the highest correct differentiation rate, followed by k-NN. The classification time for RBA is the shortest, followed by SVM or LSM, k-NN or DTW-1, and DTW-2 methods. SVM requires the longest training time, whereas DTW-2 takes the longest amount of classification time. Although there is not a significant difference between the correct differentiation rates obtained by different crossvalidation techniques, repeated random sub-sampling uses the shortest amount of classification time, whereas leave-one-out requires the longest.