Browsing by Subject "area under the curve"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Open Access
A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features
(2013) Wu, Y.; Alagoz O.; Ayvaci, M.U.S.; Munoz Del Rio, A.; Vanness, D.J.; Woods, R.; Burnside, E.S.
This study aims to determine the most informative mammographic features for breast cancer diagnosis using mutual information (MI) analysis. Our Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-approved database consists of 44,397 consecutive structured mammography reports for 20,375 patients collected from 2005 to 2008. The reports include demographic risk factors (age, family and personal history of breast cancer, and use of hormone therapy) and mammographic features from the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. We calculated MI using Shannon's entropy measure for each feature with respect to the outcome (benign/malignant using a cancer registry match as reference standard). In order to evaluate the validity of the MI rankings of features, we trained and tested naïve Bayes classifiers on the feature with tenfold cross-validation, and measured the predictive ability using area under the ROC curve (AUC). We used a bootstrapping approach to assess the distributional properties of our estimates, and the DeLong method to compare AUC. Based on MI, we found that mass margins and mass shape were the most informative features for breast cancer diagnosis. Calcification morphology, mass density, and calcification distribution provided predictive information for distinguishing benign and malignant breast findings. Breast composition, associated findings, and special cases provided little information in this task. We also found that the rankings of mammographic features with MI and AUC were generally consistent. MI analysis provides a framework to determine the value of different mammographic features in the pursuit of optimal (i.e., accurate and efficient) breast cancer diagnosis. © 2013 Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.
Open Access
Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data
(2007) Woods, B.J.; Clymer, B.D.; Kurc, T.; Heverhagen J.T.; Stevens, R.; Orsdemir, A.; Bulan O.; Knopp, M.V.
Purpose: To investigate the use of four-dimensional (4D) co-occurrence-based texture analysis to distinguish between nonmalignant and malignant tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images. Materials and Methods: 4D texture analysis was performedon DCE-MRI data sets of breast lesions. A model-free neural network-based classification system assigned each voxel a "nonmalignant" or "malignant" label based on the textural features. The classification results were compared via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the manual lesion segmentation produced by two radiologists (observers 1 and 2). Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the classifier agreed with the mean observer 2 performance when compared with segmentations by observer 1 for a 95% confidence interval, using a two-sided t-test with α = 0.05. The results show that an area under the ROC curve (Az) of 0.99948, 0.99867, and 0.99957 can be achieved by comparing the classifier vs. observer 1, classifier vs. union of both observers, and classifier vs. intersection of both observers, respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that a neural network classifier based on 4D texture analysis inputs can achieve a performance comparable to that achieved by human observers, and that further research in this area is warranted. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.