BUIR logo
Communities & Collections
All of BUIR
  • English
  • Türkçe
Log In
Please note that log in via username/password is only available to Repository staff.
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Multilevel analysis"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    A contextualized emotion perception assessment relates to personal and social well-being
    (Academic Press, 2025-02) Kafetsios, Konstantinos; Hess, Ursula; Dostal, Daniel; Seitl, Martin; Hypsova, Petra; Hareli, Shlomo; Alonso-Arbiol, Itziar; Schütz, Astrid; Gruda, Dritjon; Campbell, Kelly; Chen, Bin-Bin; Held, Marco J.; Kamble, Shanmukh; Kimura, Takuma; Kirchner-Häusler, Alexander; Livi, Stefano; Mandal, Eugenia; Ochnik, Dominika; Sakman, Ezgi; Sümer, Nebi; Theodorou, Annalisa; Uskul, Ayse K.
    Emotion Recognition Accuracy (ERA) is vital for social functioning and social relationships, yet empirical support for a positive link with well-being has been sparse. In three studies, we show that the Assessment of Contextualized Emotions (ACE) which distinguishes between accurately perceiving intended emotions and bias due to perceiving additional, secondary emotions, consistently predicted personal and social well-being. Across thirteen world cultures, accuracy was associated with higher well-being and life satisfaction, and bias linked to loneliness. A social interaction study in Czech Republic found accuracy (bias) was positively (negatively) associated with social well-being. The effects of accuracy and bias on well-being were partially mediated by social interaction quality in a third study. These findings further our understanding of ERA’s social functions.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The role of emotion word use in perceived responsiveness during getting acquainted interactions
    (2019-07) Çiftçi, Öykü
    Past research has showed that perceived responsiveness (i.e., the extent to which people think that their relationship partners understand, care for, and appreciate them) is positively associated with individual and relational well-being. However, predictors of responsiveness were not extensively investigated. Researchers predominantly investigated stable individual differences as predictors of responsiveness and ignored dynamic factors such as language use and time. In addition, perceived responsiveness was mostly studied in the context of close relationships even though responsiveness is an important construct for less intimate relationships. To fill these gaps, the current study examined the role of emotion word use in perceived responsiveness during getting acquainted interactions. Female participants (N = 200) were instructed to engage in three 15-minute interactions in pairs, in which they took turns in reading aloud and answering given sets of questions. These interactions were video-recorded and transcribed into text files to capture participants’ emotion word use via a computerized text analysis program. After each interaction, participants reported their interaction partner’s responsiveness. Results of multilevel analyses revealed that participants who used a greater number of positive emotion words during interactions also perceived their interaction partner as more responsive. In addition, as time went by, participants perceived their partner as more responsive. However, negative emotion word usage did not significantly predict perceived responsiveness of the interaction partner. These findings contribute to the responsiveness literature by revealing that dynamic interpersonal factors such as emotion word use during a live interaction and time play a role in perceived responsiveness of newly acquainted individuals.

About the University

  • Academics
  • Research
  • Library
  • Students
  • Stars
  • Moodle
  • WebMail

Using the Library

  • Collections overview
  • Borrow, renew, return
  • Connect from off campus
  • Interlibrary loan
  • Hours
  • Plan
  • Intranet (Staff Only)

Research Tools

  • EndNote
  • Grammarly
  • iThenticate
  • Mango Languages
  • Mendeley
  • Turnitin
  • Show more ..

Contact

  • Bilkent University
  • Main Campus Library
  • Phone: +90(312) 290-1298
  • Email: dspace@bilkent.edu.tr

Bilkent University Library © 2015-2025 BUIR

  • Privacy policy
  • Send Feedback