Browsing by Subject "Lower and upper bounds"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access Bicriteria multiresource generalized assignment problem(John Wiley & Sons, 2014) Karsu, O.; Azizoglu, M.In this study,we consider a bicriteria multiresource generalized assignment problem. Our criteria are the total assignment load and maximum assignment load over all agents. We aim to generate all nondominated objective vectors and the corresponding efficient solutions. We propose several lower and upper bounds and use them in our optimization and heuristic algorithms. The computational results have shown the satisfactory behaviors of our approaches.Item Open Access Double bound method for solving the p-center location problem(Elsevier, 2013) Calik, H.; Tansel, B. C.We give a review of existing methods for solving the absolute and vertex restricted p-center problems on networks and propose a new integer programming formulation, a tightened version of this formulation and a new method based on successive restrictions of the new formulation. A specialization of the new method with two-element restrictions obtains the optimal p-center solution by solving a series of simple structured integer programs in recognition form. This specialization is called the double bound method. A relaxation of the proposed formulation gives the tightest known lower bound in the literature (obtained earlier by Elloumi et al., [1]). A polynomial time algorithm is presented to compute this bound. New lower and upper bounds are proposed. Problems from the OR-Library [2] and TSPLIB [3] are solved by the proposed algorithms with up to 3038 nodes. Previous computational results were restricted to networks with at most 1817 nodes.Item Open Access Stable controllers for robust stabilization of systems with infinitely many unstable poles(Elsevier, 2013) Wakaiki, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Özbay, HitayThis paper studies the problem of robust stabilization by a stable controller for a linear time-invariant single-input single-output infinite dimensional system. We consider a class of plants having finitely many simple unstable zeros but possibly infinitely many unstable poles. First we show that the problem can be reduced to an interpolation-minimization by a unit element. Next, by the modified Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation, we obtain both lower and upper bounds on the multiplicative perturbation under which the plant can be stabilized by a stable controller. In addition, we find stable controllers to provide robust stability. We also present a numerical example to illustrate the results and apply the proposed method to a repetitive control system.Item Open Access A unified approach to universal prediction: Generalized upper and lower bounds(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015) Vanli, N. D.; Kozat, S. S.We study sequential prediction of real-valued, arbitrary, and unknown sequences under the squared error loss as well as the best parametric predictor out of a large, continuous class of predictors. Inspired by recent results from computational learning theory, we refrain from any statistical assumptions and define the performance with respect to the class of general parametric predictors. In particular, we present generic lower and upper bounds on this relative performance by transforming the prediction task into a parameter learning problem. We first introduce the lower bounds on this relative performance in the mixture of experts framework, where we show that for any sequential algorithm, there always exists a sequence for which the performance of the sequential algorithm is lower bounded by zero. We then introduce a sequential learning algorithm to predict such arbitrary and unknown sequences, and calculate upper bounds on its total squared prediction error for every bounded sequence. We further show that in some scenarios, we achieve matching lower and upper bounds, demonstrating that our algorithms are optimal in a strong minimax sense such that their performances cannot be improved further. As an interesting result, we also prove that for the worst case scenario, the performance of randomized output algorithms can be achieved by sequential algorithms so that randomized output algorithms do not improve the performance. © 2012 IEEE.