Browsing by Subject "K-nearest neighbor"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Open Access
Classifying human leg motions with uniaxial piezoelectric gyroscopes
(2009) Tunçel O.; Altun, K.; Barshan, B.
This paper provides a comparative study on the different techniques of classifying human leg motions that are performed using two low-cost uniaxial piezoelectric gyroscopes worn on the leg. A number of feature sets, extracted from the raw inertial sensor data in different ways, are used in the classification process. The classification techniques implemented and compared in this study are: Bayesian decision making (BDM), a rule-based algorithm (RBA) or decision tree, least-squares method (LSM), k-nearest neighbor algorithm (k-NN), dynamic time warping (DTW), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). A performance comparison of these classification techniques is provided in terms of their correct differentiation rates, confusion matrices, computational cost, and training and storage requirements. Three different cross-validation techniques are employed to validate the classifiers. The results indicate that BDM, in general, results in the highest correct classification rate with relatively small computational cost. © 2009 by the authors.
Open Access
Distance-based classification methods
(Taylor & Francis, 1999) Ekin, O.; Hammer, P. L.; Kogan, A.; Winter, P.
Given a set of points in a Euclidean space, and a partitioning of this 'training set' into two or more subsets ('classes'), we consider the problem of identifying a 'reasonable' assignment of another point in the Euclidean space ('query point') to one of these classes. The various classifications proposed in this paper are determined by the distances between the query point and the points in the training set. We report results of extensive computational experiments comparing the new methods with two well-known distance-based classification methods (k-nearest neighbors and Parzen windows) on data sets commonly used in the literature. The results show that the performance of both new and old distance-based methods is on par with and often better than that of the other best classification methods known. Moreover, the new classification procedures proposed in this paper are: (i) easy to implement, (ii) extremely fast, and (iii) very robust (i.e. their performance is insignificantly affected by the choice of parameter values).