Browsing by Subject "Gene Duplication"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Open Access The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes(2012) Prüfer, K.; Munch, K.; Hellmann I.; Akagi, K.; Miller J.R.; Walenz, B.; Koren, S.; Sutton G.; Kodira, C.; Winer, R.; Knight J.R.; Mullikin J.C.; Meader, S.J.; Ponting, C.P.; Lunter G.; Higashino, S.; Hobolth, A.; Dutheil J.; Karakoç, E.; Alkan, C.; Sajjadian, S.; Catacchio, C.R.; Ventura, M.; Marques-Bonet, T.; Eichler, E.E.; André, C.; Atencia, R.; Mugisha L.; Junhold J.; Patterson, N.; Siebauer, M.; Good J.M.; Fischer, A.; Ptak, S.E.; Lachmann, M.; Symer, D.E.; Mailund, T.; Schierup, M.H.; Andrés, A.M.; Kelso J.; Pääbo, S.Two African apes are the closest living relatives of humans: the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and the bonobo (Pan paniscus). Although they are similar in many respects, bonobos and chimpanzees differ strikingly in key social and sexual behaviours, and for some of these traits they show more similarity with humans than with each other. Here we report the sequencing and assembly of the bonobo genome to study its evolutionary relationship with the chimpanzee and human genomes. We find that more than three per cent of the human genome is more closely related to either the bonobo or the chimpanzee genome than these are to each other. These regions allow various aspects of the ancestry of the two ape species to be reconstructed. In addition, many of the regions that overlap genes may eventually help us understand the genetic basis of phenotypes that humans share with one of the two apes to the exclusion of the other. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.Item Open Access Copy number variation of individual cattle genomes using next-generation sequencing(2012) Bickhart, D.M.; Hou, Y.; Schroeder, S.G.; Alkan C.; Cardone, M.F.; Matukumalli L.K.; Song J.; Schnabel, R.D.; Ventura M.; Taylor J.F.; Garcia J.F.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Sonstegard, T.S.; Eichler, E. E.; Liu G.E.Copy number variations (CNVs) affect a wide range of phenotypic traits; however, CNVs in or near segmental duplication regions are often intractable. Using a read depth approach based on next-generation sequencing, we examined genome - wide copy number differences among five taurine (three Angus, one Holstein, and one Hereford) and one indicine (Nelore) cattle. Within mapped chromosomal sequence, we identified 1265 CNV regions comprising ∼55.6-Mbp sequence-476 of which (~38%) have not previously been reported. We validated this sequence-based CNV call set with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), achieving a validation rate of 82% and a false positive rate of 8%. We further estimated absolute copy numbers for genomic segments and annotated genes in each individual. Surveys of the top 25 most variable genes revealed that the Nelore individual had the lowest copy numbers in 13 cases (∼52%, χ 2 test; P-value <0.05). In contrast, genes related to pathogen- and parasite-resistance, such as CATHL4 and ULBP17, were highly duplicated in the Nelore individual relative to the taurine cattle, while genes involved in lipid transport and metabolism, including APOL3 and FABP2, were highly duplicated in the beef breeds. These CNV regions also harbor genes like BPIFA2A (BSP30A) and WC1, suggesting that some CNVs may be associated with breed-specific differences in adaptation, health, and production traits. By providing the first individualized cattle CNV and segmental duplication maps and genome-wide gene copy number estimates, we enable future CNV studies into highly duplicated regions in the cattle genome. © 2012 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.