Browsing by Subject "Feature reduction"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Open Access
Authorship attribution: performance of various features and classification methods
(IEEE, 2007-11) Bozkurt, İlker Nadi; Bağlıoğlu, Özgür; Uyar, Erkan
Authorship attribution is the process of determining the writer of a document. In literature, there are lots of classification techniques conducted in this process. In this paper we explore information retrieval methods such as tf-idf structure with support vector machines, parametric and nonparametric methods with supervised and unsupervised (clustering) classification techniques in authorship attribution. We performed various experiments with articles gathered from Turkish newspaper Milliyet. We performed experiments on different features extracted from these texts with different classifiers, and combined these results to improve our success rates. We identified which classifiers give satisfactory results on which feature sets. According to experiments, the success rates dramatically changes with different combinations, however the best among them are support vector classifier with bag of words, and Gaussian with function words. ©2007 IEEE.
Open Access
Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors
(Elsevier, 2010) Altun, K.; Barshan, B.; Tunçel, O.
This paper provides a comparative study on the different techniques of classifying human activities that are performed using body-worn miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. The classification techniques implemented and compared in this study are: Bayesian decision making (BDM), a rule-based algorithm (RBA) or decision tree, the least-squares method (LSM), the k-nearest neighbor algorithm (k-NN), dynamic time warping (DTW), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). Human activities are classified using five sensor units worn on the chest, the arms, and the legs. Each sensor unit comprises a tri-axial gyroscope, a tri-axial accelerometer, and a tri-axial magnetometer. A feature set extracted from the raw sensor data using principal component analysis (PCA) is used in the classification process. A performance comparison of the classification techniques is provided in terms of their correct differentiation rates, confusion matrices, and computational cost, as well as their pre-processing, training, and storage requirements. Three different cross-validation techniques are employed to validate the classifiers. The results indicate that in general, BDM results in the highest correct classification rate with relatively small computational cost.
Open Access
Human activity recognition using inertial/magnetic sensor units
(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010) Altun, Kerem; Barshan, Billur
This paper provides a comparative study on the different techniques of classifying human activities that are performed using body-worn miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. The classification techniques implemented and compared in this study are: Bayesian decision making (BDM), the least-squares method (LSM), the k-nearest neighbor algorithm (k-NN), dynamic time warping (DTW), support vector machines (SVM), and artificial neural networks (ANN). Daily and sports activities are classified using five sensor units worn by eight subjects on the chest, the arms, and the legs. Each sensor unit comprises a triaxial gyroscope, a triaxial accelerometer, and a triaxial magnetometer. Principal component analysis (PCA) and sequential forward feature selection (SFFS) methods are employed for feature reduction. For a small number of features, SFFS demonstrates better performance and should be preferable especially in real-time applications. The classifiers are validated using different cross-validation techniques. Among the different classifiers we have considered, BDM results in the highest correct classification rate with relatively small computational cost. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Open Access
Investigating inter-subject and inter-activity variations in activity recognition using wearable motion sensors
(Oxford University Press, 2016) Barshan, B.; Yurtman, A.
This work investigates inter-subject and inter-activity variability of a given activity dataset and provides some new definitions to quantify such variability. The definitions are sufficiently general and can be applied to a broad class of datasets that involve time sequences or features acquired using wearable sensors. The study is motivated by contradictory statements in the literature on the need for user-specific training in activity recognition. We employ our publicly available dataset that contains 19 daily and sports activities acquired from eight participants who wear five motion sensor units each. We pre-process recorded activity time sequences in three different ways and employ absolute, Euclidean and dynamic time warping distance measures to quantify the similarity of the recorded signal patterns. We define and calculate the average inter-subject and inter-activity distances with various methods based on the raw and pre-processed time-domain data as well as on the raw and pre-processed feature vectors. These definitions allow us to identify the subject who performs the activities in the most representative way and pinpoint the activities that show more variation among the subjects. We observe that the type of pre-processing used affects the results of the comparisons but that the different distance measures do not alter the comparison results as much. We check the consistency of our analysis and results by highlighting some of our activity recognition rates based on an exhaustive set of sensor unit, sensor type and subject combinations. We expect the results to be useful for dynamic sensor unit/type selection, for deciding whether to perform user-specific training and for designing more effective classifiers in activity recognition.