Browsing by Author "Kortik, Sitar"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2

Open Access
Linear planning logic: An efficient language and theorem prover for robotic task planning
(IEEE, 2014-06-07) Kortik, Sitar; Saranlı, U.
In this paper, we introduce a novel logic language and theorem prover for robotic task planning. Our language, which we call Linear Planning Logic (LPL), is a fragment of linear logic whose resource-conscious semantics are well suited for reasoning with dynamic state, while its structure admits efficient theorem provers for automatic plan construction. LPL can be considered as an extension of Linear Hereditary Harrop Formulas (LHHF), whose careful design allows the minimization of nondeterminism in proof search, providing a sufficient basis for the design of linear logic programming languages such as Lolli. Our new language extends on the expressivity of LHHF, while keeping the resulting nondeterminism in proof search to a minimum for efficiency. This paper introduces the LPL language, presents the main ideas behind our theorem prover on a smaller fragment of this language and finally provides an experimental illustration of its operation on the problem of task planning for the hexapod robot RHex. © 2014 IEEE.
Open Access
Robotic task planning using a backchaining theorem prover for multiplicative exponential first-order linear logic
(Springer, 2019) Kortik, Sitar; Saranlı, U.
In this paper, we propose an exponential multiplicative fragment of linear logic to encode and solve planning problems efficiently in STRIPS domain, that we call the Linear Planning Logic (LPL). Linear logic is a resource aware logic treating resources as single use assumptions, therefore enabling encoding and reasoning of domains with dynamic state. One of the most important examples of dynamic state domains is robotic task planning, since informational or physical states of a robot include non-monotonic characteristics. Our novel theorem prover is using the backchaining method which is suitable for logic languages like Lolli and Prolog. Additionally, we extend LPL to be able to encode non-atomic conclusions in program formulae. Following the introduction of the language, our theorem prover and its implementation, we present associated algorithmic properties through small but informative examples. Subsequently, we also present a navigation domain using the hexapod robot RHex to show LPL’s operation on a real robotic planning problem. Finally, we provide comparisons of LPL with two existing linear logic theorem provers, llprover and linTAP. We show that LPL outperforms these theorem provers for planning domains.